View Topic

Sapph, bit of a random question but when we came on at EoD1 and you offered to help vote on somebody, who would you have agreed to vote if I'd have suggested them?

Literally anyone who has already posted on the thread

Not just random , he did show a casual reason as well , just like he did with Michi last time , calling him a bad person , and this time , like a six-year old craving for revenge just because someone beat him at a game of rock-paper-scissors . This seems normal , don't you think the same ?

Yeah that’s Gerrick’s D1 gimmick

So question: do you think my vote for Gerrick was serious?

@Legacy of Smiles

What are your thoughts on Lau , and how much do you agree on my points , except for the part in which I put you in the same alignment as I have put Lau in (definitely that part is a disagreement)

So question: do you think my vote for Gerrick was serious?

Lmao of course not

Great!

What?

Oh, my b, I meant to ask that question to Anu.

Only reason I brought up BSR after his absence from the list was mentioned was that I was working on that message before Doc posted, and got that "Warning - new reply" message when I went to post. Because it was a pair of Valerians, notably my son and brother, I wanted to give them a hard time about it regardless.

Anu, everything I say or do in Werewolf is a push against Laurentus, though usually not particularly seriously. We've been burned by each other too many times before.

Laurentus, my gut is leaning towards town for you. Not strongly, but definitely town.

Did you check that warning stuff before you posted the content of that post ?

Hmm, Doc beat me to pointing out the lack of BSR! Lau, did you neglect to mention BSR because you genuinely forgot him, or because your roles are connected by PM and he's been active there? I wonder...

Because he hasn't yet posted (and I know that my family is particularly dangerous) I will Vote: Make BraveSirRobin leave.

Great , now I don't know if I am right about this , because I never switched in between writing a post to check the warning notifs, but your post came 8mins after Doc's post , and your post couldn't have taken more than 3-4mins to type out(at most) . Pls correct me if I have got something wrong about the timing and stuff

Oh, my b, I meant to ask that question to Anu.

I was tempted to answer it , but waited for Sapph , as of the vote , I don't take the seriousness around it as concerning , the pre-emptive defensiveness part of your reasoning rang alarm , and he said that he would be busy , and honestly , its the last excuse that could be distrusted if a player is honest . And Gerrick is a dangerous person out there , which is why an early wagon on him could have had ended as a farewell for Gerrick.

Atm , the only thing I am afraid of is going too deep on one person , which is why I want someone else to speak , someone else to give a reads list . Its exhausting to chase Lau again and again , all the way .

I will probably get a read list out tomorrow, it’s way into an unholy hour and I need rest. Meanwhile everyone please offer a read list each, thank you

And I don't want to miss out on scum and the tricks they are brewing , in the much silent zone of this party .

The deaf and dumb lacks enemies and exposure . I wouldn't be sad if I lose to scum who stayed low completely , because its unfair advantage they have in their palms.

I'm pretty sure we're arguing for no reason.  I'm pretty good with reading Valeria people methinks, and Lau and Colby are definitely very townie right now, they'd be less jokey in my opinion if they were wolves.  There'd be some humor for sure, because they probably know they would need to add some to be on par with normal them, but none of it seems even slightly forced so I'm definitely betting both are town.

LoS again really not sure could go either way, but I do like the Gerrick and Doc analysis that he's got.  But as Bush says, "fool me once—shame on, shame on you.  Fool me twice... you can't fool me again" 

Also Anu what exactly are you trying to say about Colby?  I think you *might* be a bit overthinking things there I don't see anything particularly incriminating

ALSO WTF FOUR NEW REPLIES WHILE I WAS POSTING AND FREAKING 6 PAGES?!

The vote post from Colberius X certainly seems a push against you , if not , then a soft try to get you into a soft claim stuff . The other obvious option is trying to distance , and the way he asked you about link to BSR , on relatively miniscule miss seems out of place .

I don't mind a push against me, as long as I understand the thought process behind it. It would honestly be very weird to me if Colby doesn't reaction test me, given our long history. We're both base bastards at our cores, and we think alike a lot.

I don't at all see what you mean by him trying to get me to soft-claim.

Distancing is a viable hypothesis. I agree with you there.

I don't get what you mean when you say that investigating whether there is a link between me and BSR is out of place. It's a valid road to go down. I'd have asked the same question in Colby's place. This rather chummy thing BSR and I have going on should make any reasonable person wonder at that too.

I don't get what's happening here, Anu. Your reasoning was razor sharp last game. Now you're grasping at straws and, to be blunt, pushing false narratives.

Great!

What?

It was a reactions test, I wanted to get a better grasp on you before I was comfortable outing my town lean on you. (The thought process being that scum answering that question would pick the obviously more towny answer and list specific names / groups of people or otherwise react in any way other than what you did, especially because scum-you would have had to already have considered who you were willing to vote in order to presumably not last min vote a scumbuddy and would have probably just shared a tweaked version of your real scum thought process in that case). So the question was designed in a way, I hope, that means that only a Townsperson would have responded the way you did.

Not an exhaustive reason to TR you but I'm fine giving you the day pass for that + how you acted late D1.

Anubhav, thanks for the question, I'll get to answering you shortly when I have time to sit down.

Oh, my b, I meant to ask that question to Anu.

I was tempted to answer it , but waited for Sapph , as of the vote , I don't take the seriousness around it as concerning , the pre-emptive defensiveness part of your reasoning rang alarm , and he said that he would be busy , and honestly , its the last excuse that could be distrusted if a player is honest . And Gerrick is a dangerous person out there , which is why an early wagon on him could have had ended as a farewell for Gerrick.

Was he a wagon, though? I made one RVS vote on him which he didn't even bother to address.

Great!

What?

It was a reactions test, I wanted to get a better grasp on you before I was comfortable outing my town lean on you. (The thought process being that scum answering that question would pick the obviously more towny answer and list specific names / groups of people or otherwise react in any way other than what you did, especially because scum-you would have had to already have considered who you were willing to vote in order to presumably not last min vote a scumbuddy and would have probably just shared a tweaked version of your real scum thought process in that case). So the question was designed in a way, I hope, that means that only a Townsperson would have responded the way you did.

Not an exhaustive reason to TR you but I'm fine giving you the day pass for that + how you acted late D1.

Anubhav, thanks for the question, I'll get to answering you shortly when I have time to sit down.

Nah, LoS, Sapph is a damn good player, that answer was NAI from him.

Great , now I don't know if I am right about this , because I never switched in between writing a post to check the warning notifs, but your post came 8mins after Doc's post , and your post couldn't have taken more than 3-4mins to type out(at most) . Pls correct me if I have got something wrong about the timing and stuff

Maybe 3-4 minutes for a normal person...  Anyone who knows me well knows that I'm a man of few, carefully crafted words. In life in general, and in WW especially. When I saw that Doc had posted, it took me at least 2 minutes to decide whether or not to still post, much less actually revise my post.

I don't mind a push against me, as long as I understand the thought process behind it. It would honestly be very weird to me if Colby doesn't reaction test me, given our long history. We're both base bastards at our cores, and we think alike a lot.

Can wholeheartedly confirm.