I humbly request that this Act be reconsidered by the Storting during this term. If you may remember, it passed the Underhusen before failing in the Overhusen for unknown reasons. I would like to highlight the many benefits that I believe this Act would bring to the region over the current judicial law:
1) Increase the group of potential jurors for cases from just current members of the Storting to current and past members, allowing for more people while also still requiring people with experience in Wintrean law.
2) Requires that all cases be considered by selecting the jurors as soon as the case is filed. If you will remember, a case filed by Chanku about the Criminal Code of Laws was essentially ignored by the Storting. While not judging the merits of Chanku's case, it would be disturbing if a criminal case were ignored in similar manner, as could technically happen under current law.
3) Gives additional authority to the Storting by requiring that it approve of the random method used to select jurors for each case.
4) Bars people from serving as jurors if they are directly involved in the case, and additionally gives jurors the option to recuse themselves from a case.
5) Most importantly, dissolves each individual court once the proceedings are finished, maintain the ad hoc judiciary we currently have and preventing an arbitrary court from assuming power over time with impunity. To that end, jurors can be removed with the consent of both myself and the Storting.
I still believe that these would be beneficial to the region. However, should the proposal not be considered by the Storting or fail during this term, I will not attempt to advance it any further. It wouldn't make sense to keep bringing up something that fails twice.