View Topic

Game Over on Round 5 Day

Root Host: Caitlinuwu

Players · Votes · Posts

also good wolves won't give a fuck whether the person is active or not 

ime if anything wolves WILL prefer to go after active players because most wolves are lame and prefer to win by nuking the active players and leaving inactive or out of the loop players in the endgame to ensure an easy win

so that logic is just
not great?

are you forgetting that the R in RVS stands for Random

People use "random" for tons of things that aren't random (e.g. "I talked to this random guy today!") It's not like people pull names from a hat and then vote for them. In fact, doing that would be wolfy since you're not committing to any sort of thought process.

also good wolves won't give a fuck whether the person is active or not

ime if anything wolves WILL prefer to go after active players because most wolves are lame and prefer to win by nuking the active players and leaving inactive or out of the loop players in the endgame to ensure an easy win

so that logic is just
not great?

Good wolves prefer to pocket active players, not go after them which can easily backfire. Especially in a game with as many slankers as this one.

I can actually see your point if you meant townleading player rather than "vocal". Because I'd agree that pushing for a townleader is something wolves wouldn't do

but like being loud (or vocal) and being a townleader are two very different things and I think it's still a bit too early for there to be a townleading player since we haven't had some flips to see who's playing well this game

are you forgetting that the R in RVS stands for Random

People use "random" for tons of things that aren't random (e.g. "I talked to this random guy today!") It's not like people pull names from a hat and then vote for them. In fact, doing that would be wolfy since you're not committing to any sort of thought process.

I'm so confused by your example
but yea people do in fact pull names out a hat during the RVS, that's kinda the whole point

vote random, see who overreacts (or lacks reaction), and then you have a brief foundation on what's worth poking or not

also good wolves won't give a fuck whether the person is active or not

ime if anything wolves WILL prefer to go after active players because most wolves are lame and prefer to win by nuking the active players and leaving inactive or out of the loop players in the endgame to ensure an easy win

so that logic is just
not great?

Good wolves prefer to pocket active players, not go after them which can easily backfire. Especially in a game with as many slankers as this one.

pocketing is a bad wolf play and kinda only works on newbies??

good mafia players will realize the possibility of being pocketed and will actually start getting paranoid of the people doing so

are you forgetting that the R in RVS stands for Random

People use "random" for tons of things that aren't random (e.g. "I talked to this random guy today!") It's not like people pull names from a hat and then vote for them. In fact, doing that would be wolfy since you're not committing to any sort of thought process.

I'm so confused by your example
but yea people do in fact pull names out a hat during the RVS, that's kinda the whole point

vote random, see who overreacts (or lacks reaction), and then you have a brief foundation on what's worth poking or not

also good wolves won't give a fuck whether the person is active or not

ime if anything wolves WILL prefer to go after active players because most wolves are lame and prefer to win by nuking the active players and leaving inactive or out of the loop players in the endgame to ensure an easy win

so that logic is just
not great?

Good wolves prefer to pocket active players, not go after them which can easily backfire. Especially in a game with as many slankers as this one.

pocketing is a bad wolf play and kinda only works on newbies??

good mafia players will realize the possibility of being pocketed and will actually start getting paranoid of the people doing so

If there's no case on someone, what is there to react to? Why bot do pressuring, which actually generates reactions? RVS fucking sucks and there's a reason that good werewolf sites don't do it

Also, if you think you can't get pocketed, you are probably one of the players most vulnerable to being pocketed

you're literally reacting to my vote proving the fact that it does indeed generate reactions

you're literally reacting to my vote proving the fact that it does indeed generate reactions

Because it sucks. Don't think that's the reaction you're looking for

as long it helps me read your slot so it doesn't matter if it was what I expected lol

and it's amusing

are you forgetting that the R in RVS stands for Random

People use "random" for tons of things that aren't random (e.g. "I talked to this random guy today!") It's not like people pull names from a hat and then vote for them. In fact, doing that would be wolfy since you're not committing to any sort of thought process.

I'm so confused by your example
but yea people do in fact pull names out a hat during the RVS, that's kinda the whole point

vote random, see who overreacts (or lacks reaction), and then you have a brief foundation on what's worth poking or not

also good wolves won't give a fuck whether the person is active or not

ime if anything wolves WILL prefer to go after active players because most wolves are lame and prefer to win by nuking the active players and leaving inactive or out of the loop players in the endgame to ensure an easy win

so that logic is just
not great?

Good wolves prefer to pocket active players, not go after them which can easily backfire. Especially in a game with as many slankers as this one.

pocketing is a bad wolf play and kinda only works on newbies??

good mafia players will realize the possibility of being pocketed and will actually start getting paranoid of the people doing so

If there's no case on someone, what is there to react to? Why bot do pressuring, which actually generates reactions? RVS fucking sucks and there's a reason that good werewolf sites don't do it

Also, if you think you can't get pocketed, you are probably one of the players most vulnerable to being pocketed

also nobody said anything about "can't get pocketed". I said that good players will always be paranoid of being pocketed, which makes it a risky play for wolves

are you forgetting that the R in RVS stands for Random

People use "random" for tons of things that aren't random (e.g. "I talked to this random guy today!") It's not like people pull names from a hat and then vote for them. In fact, doing that would be wolfy since you're not committing to any sort of thought process.

I'm so confused by your example
but yea people do in fact pull names out a hat during the RVS, that's kinda the whole point

vote random, see who overreacts (or lacks reaction), and then you have a brief foundation on what's worth poking or not

also good wolves won't give a fuck whether the person is active or not

ime if anything wolves WILL prefer to go after active players because most wolves are lame and prefer to win by nuking the active players and leaving inactive or out of the loop players in the endgame to ensure an easy win

so that logic is just
not great?

Good wolves prefer to pocket active players, not go after them which can easily backfire. Especially in a game with as many slankers as this one.

pocketing is a bad wolf play and kinda only works on newbies??

good mafia players will realize the possibility of being pocketed and will actually start getting paranoid of the people doing so

If there's no case on someone, what is there to react to? Why bot do pressuring, which actually generates reactions? RVS fucking sucks and there's a reason that good werewolf sites don't do it

Also, if you think you can't get pocketed, you are probably one of the players most vulnerable to being pocketed

also nobody said anything about "can't get pocketed". I said that good players will always be paranoid of being pocketed, which makes it a risky play for wolves

It's not really that risky, since wolves can shoot said player if it doesn't work out.

I'm not going to use Quotes anymore.

TWTBAW is short for Too Wolfy To Be A Wolf. It's technically a fallacy but can be helpful for some people in determining if something they perceive as wolfy is actually wolfy.

I'm extremely annoyed at the thought that Ori might be town.

This makes me paranoid about my Sugar read too.

Vote: Rem

I Actually have experience with you.

I'm extremely annoyed at the thought that Ori might be town.

This makes me paranoid about my Sugar read too.

Vote: Rem

I Actually have experience with you.

And you are either
 
wolf

Or still terrible at reading me

Or still a terrible player

But I've never been terrible at reading you. The worst I've done is give up my correct read for paranoia or sanity.