Alright, let's get down to it.
First up, Corbin since it is necessary to address the flow of (il)logic coming from there.
The immediate post, wherein you took time to do correct spelling, reeks of damage control because of how you immediately generated two negative perspectives on you. Your entire post culminates in, "I'm not doing this," when you are, in fact, doing this. That is, you take time to say *why* you don't need to defend yourself despite the excruciating fact that you **are** defending yourself in that very post. For example,
"I need not defend myself, i was just pointing something out as well. If just felt to me that they were hiding behind words. I don't know any of you too well, but if you really are concerned with me feeling fake, then perhaps i shall take my mask off for the rest of the game."A snipet of your post wherein you speak about not needing to defend yourself, but in the same segment you address a *concern* noted by those negatively viewing you and proceed to **address** said concern while, at the same time, ***validating*** said concern about feeling fake. That is, you are going to remove your mask to play as your typical self which, thusly, means you were being fake to us at present.For as much as you claim that it feels that I, of all people, am hiding behind words, you're the one using a lot of words to say you're not doing one thing when, in fact, you actually are doing that very thing (ie. being fake). And I'm the one you're susing words? If anything, you're literally projecting onto me an issue that you are having. It's blatantly obtuse on your part (though I get the feeling this is intentional as opposed to unintentional as your progression, despite the responses, reads as doubling down on what you're trying to vaguely paint. In absolutely not a cohesive manner no less).If you're having a hard time following, I'm saying that your insistence that I am suspicious for, quote unquote, "hiding behind words" is absolutely broad and, in no way, actually addresses the content being put forth. It's literally like you're just playing off of me so you have something to say when, otherwise, you are sorely lacking in generating content. And that's strictly evident as all your posts, so it seems, deal with me as a prevailing topic. I mean, I don't blame you, I draw the attention, but it's glaring that you're making no effort outside of your limp attempts at susing me to actually progress anything else in any way, shape, or form.It's grotesque.* * * * * * * * ** * * * * Now, because it was said to slight me, MeleKoD's playstyle is to bury everyone with wordage regardless of alignment, so to solve him, you need to analyze his content.
You watched Champs. That is, patently, ****NOT**** my playstyle. My "playstyle" is to get in here and play the game. I just happen to have a lot to say on various subjects least I end up like the lot of you that choose to sloth it through stuff. A ***side effect***, perhaps, of my style may be burying people, but that's only for those people who can't bring themselves to actually, you know, play the game. That's hardly my fault. When it comes to Champs, you get in and you play. Anything less is a mistake. Sure, I may get some love for what I do, and, often times, I may get hate, but you know what I don't get if I do what most of you do? Nothing. No victory. No glory. Absolutely nothing, and that is unacceptable.That being said, let's be specific with Corbin here.Your desire to hard shield him because he's new is eh. I'd say it reeks of coaching, but that'd be more prevalent in scum chat than it would be openly, unless you were trying to power wolf. And, after last game, it seems you do have that type of bone in your body, Mele, but I doubt it's developed enough to be full-fledged power wolf. Regardless, the issue with Corbin is one of logical flow and his responses. His communication isn't nonstandard -- he's obviously demonstrated he can easily talk without issue. No, the issue with him is what I laid about above. And such an issue is usually born from an inconsistency that is born of having to be in the role of scum having to fake their interactions in order to try and appear genuine.That's the obvious issue with Corbin and how he's approaching things/progressing himself.Also, what is wrong with you, Mele? You have no clue whether or not Aers was successful in adjusting the targets of the NKs. Furthermore, given that lack of knowledge, why would you not assume the more likely scenario that the targets were as is since, you know, the chances of the Killer's kill being redirected by Aers is lower than the chance of the Killer choosing a target Aers did not target. That is, it's more likely, strictly speaking, that there is no overlap in the targets. Your perspective on this is one of trying to keep things open, even individual analysis, rather than trying to, you know, solve. That's counterintuitive since you're not analyzing and putting out your own content to help solve (that, as opposed to just shooting down ideas you disagree with and offering up your own).MeleI don't like the assumption that any of the kills N1 we're 100% deliberate.
And ***I*** don't like that you're just being disagreeable with no analysis of your own. Especially when you look at the chosen targets and consider several facets:- The chances of one person overlapping with Aers' targets.- The chances of both people (Killer and Mafia) targeting Aers' targets.
- The chance that the NK target voting NoName (Aers in this case) was killed despite how votes fell (Aers voted NoName with me).
Those facets paint a situation that, statistically, is more likely to be the case that no interference happened with the targeting
and that the targeting was strictly deliberate in both cases (the mafia's target most of all, and the Killer's because obv the killer targeted and killed NoName off the basis that it is statistically more likely the targeting was unaffected as opposed to the alternative).
So, yeah, you're doing nothing other than disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing with nothing else to offer in place other than pointing fingers at us for our analysis (of which you are sorely lacking in doing mind you).
MeleCoupled with how KoD seems to be invested in portraying the wolves as quiet and/or inexperienced, and I can easily see a wolf-lead narrative being built up in this here thread.
Yeah, you're literally misrepresenting part of my playstyle which maintains a certain philosophy: More often than not mafia are quiet (I never said anything about inexperienced, unless you are referring to my analysis in which case you're sorely misrepping that as well as you're missing out about how, based on the way the NKs fell, you don't have a strict scum team of inexperienced players, yet also have to contend with the fact that someone, like NoName, was killed as opposed to literal low posters like the ones I named previous: Svi, Corbin (at the time), and whoever else hasn't participated).
* * * * * * * ** * *
@ Gerrick:
Did you even read my post? I wouldn't fault you if you didn't since that's the general trend of Spec Chat.
I thoroughly explained why Corbin comes off as being scummy. Svi hasn't taken a stance that comes off as weird yet that I can look into (prior to today's postings, she simply said she would be around more). Meanwhile, Corbin came out the gate with a PoV that was head tilt worthy given how he progressed it. Like, I'm scummy because I'm hiding behind words? My words literally communicate my stances in no small way. Yet I'm "hiding" while there are others not even posting beyond an initial post.
If you can't see the logical flow of my reasoning for viewing Corbin as scummy off of that, then I'm sorry you're not able to interpret my words properly. As far as I am concerned, I've made it glaringly obvious how I came to my conclusions, and they are not hard to follow in the least. So the question gets raised: Are you, like Mele, trying to shield Corbin, but in not as direct a way? And if so, why? Because you're curious why I'm not calling Svi scum even though it should be obvious why I'm not?
GerrickHonestly, think I'd prefer Neon, but I'm totally cool with KoD at this moment.
So, Neon, remember how you wouldn't find me as town in our Champs game? I want you to look upon this quote from Gerrick. Does it remind you of anyone? It reminds me of Dk.
Because, right now, you've got the same general vibe coming from both Mele and Gerrick wrt to you and I. That is, based on what they're saying (Mele was more direct), they are seeing a scum team of you and I. And for lackluster reasons no less (definitely not the same quality of scum like what we faced if they are scum -- they certainly trend scummy to me from these interactions).
* * * * * * * **
Corbin I am suspicious of KoD, they all of a sudden posted a reply three times larger than everyone else's. Now i could brush this off but some people have made it clear that they think that the certainness of some people's words are quite suspicious, especially when we know that there was someone who could switch targets and stuff around.
I think that Kod is the lone killer or part of that group, is it a group? Ya'll say mafia, meaning that it is a group. I say lone killer because that is what the words, in the night report thing, seem to me. They seem way too out there to be with a team but that could be a play.
Well, at least there is a little bit of analysis here even if it is still wtf worthy. But hey, I've seen worse. So the length of my posts makes me scummy. If you actually did a statistical regression model on my post lengths and proved that the longer my posts, the more likely I am to be scum, then I'd say you have a valid point; however, you'd be remiss to find out that you're absolutely wrong in your approach. But, as you've said, you haven't played with us so you wouldn't know any better. Unless you're lying.
Either way, there is such a thing as being too obtuse. Eh.