Anyway, I'm really suspicious that Gerrick is a human for several reasons. Firstly, Lau jokingly pointed out "pre-emptive defensiveness" in Gerrick's first post, in which he voted Nyght. Alone this wouldn't be that suspicious but combined with everything else I'll talk about it does raise legitimate concerns to me. It should be noted that in AoT he didn't see the need to defend his D1 vote. He later switched his vote to Legacy and put Nyght in his town-reads, then switched his vote to Anubhav. He later switches TGN from a town-lean to a scum-lean based on meta-reasoning and a "theory" which he has not brought up again and votes him. In Gerrick's last post of D2,
he puts Nyght as his fourth town read. Today, he puts Nyght as his second-lowest human read with absolutely no explanation of the change.
Some things that Legacy said are also really speaking to me:
Gerrick - I don't like how he made a post defending Anubhav but then had Anubhav as the second-lowest read on his list in that same post and then votes Anubhav in the following post. I feel like if his defence was genuine, Anubhav would surely be higher for him? I think the scumread on me was something he just did without putting much effort in and that he only actually justified it after I questioned him on it (and his apologetic tone makes me think he knows I'm town -> TMI). Last game Gerrick was extremely insightful and I know I personally saw him as a huge threat but I'm not seeing the genuine solving I saw then here.
Scum Lean:
Gerrick - Reads progression yesterday was really weird, especially about me and Anubhav. Playing very differently to last game and his reads seem a lot more opportunistic/ingenuine than then.
Gerrick made large, clearly explained, and insightful posts in AoT which though it was at times wrong, still felt townie based on tone to me, whereas now, when he's posted that's something in-game-focused, it's been short, with a small amount of explanation if any, and at times even noticeably inconsistent. I'm not feeling the townie tone.
In Gerrick's latest post, he puts me as his top town read, then completely ignores everything I said and votes Hydra on reasoning he knows has a high probability of being flawed, as the subject of whether alignments are assigned by RNG or not has been discussed multiple times recently. As far as I can remember the topic has always concluded with the host stating that the alignments/roles were assigned based on RNG, with as tau said perhaps some curating. Also, given that tau and Gerrick have both played in Michi's hosted games they should both generally have the same amount of knowledge of how Michi assigns roles.