Post #72070
April 14, 2016, 10:52:06 AM
I do agree that evidence shouldn't be anonymous. Either the person should speak up if they're allowing their evidence to be used, or the evidence itself shouldn't be used. I understand being wary about being put out there in this, but considering the gravity of this act, anyone involved in any way needs to be known. It's not in the least bit fair to condemn anyone, even Gov, in the shadows. You wouldn't want that to be how people would be towards you if you were on the burner, and for as irritating as Gov can be, he doesn't deserve to have people slinking in the shadows and pointing fingers invisibly.
And since this isn't anything incredibly sensitive, there's no reason to be anonymous.