Post #72071
April 14, 2016, 11:00:14 AM
I'm just going to say that those who wish to remain anonymous have as much right of doing so as Gov's counsel does.
I urge them to step forward, and present their evidence, as Lumen has done, but if they wish to send that evidence to their preferred Skrifa, they have just as much right to it.
What I am stressing here is that we need that evidence if we're going to consider what you have to say, since it could well be crucial to the case we're making, and it might even force us to take stronger action if said evidence warrants it. Currently we obviously have people who were hoping for stronger action being taken than we're even considering at present, but until a reason can be given to support that, revocation, and revocation only, is the way this is headed. PnG is, at this point, a bit disproportionate, since we don't want to declare Gov an enemy of the state while we haven't even done the in-between step of revoking his citizenship. That might change if the evidence to support PnG is compelling enough, but then we need that evidence.
Anyway, I just wanted to say we don't need to know the identity of Gov's counsel either.