Get ready for some serious head-banging then.
I'm currently out of energy, but I'll try to nail Aaron for old time's sake.
I'll start with your second paragraph and move on to each following one with each new number, as I'm too lazy to quote right now.
1) Correct, you picked up on my change in tone, and then completely misunderstood it, saying I was "defensive" and "flippant," when admitting I simply made a mistake would pretty much be the opposite of that. Getting a bit over-eager there, Aaron, which lends itself well to you only having tunnel-vision, at the least, and being a Koopa, at the worst. Though in this case I'll go with the first, since I would think an intelligent player like you would learn not to be so outspoken and confrontational as the wolf when that led to you being lynched previously. Though perhaps you anticipated that we wouldn't expect you to do the same thing twice, thus using that as a clever disguise, so note to everyone if I end up getting hammered: bandwagon on Aaron.
Sound ridiculous? Of course. And yet you always seem to employ similar reasoning when trying to nail me.
2) I can't speak to aternox's strategy here. He's perfectly capable of explaining himself, however, so I'll leave him to it.
3) Same story as above.
4) It wasn't my English which led to this mistake. I can't really explain what went wrong here, I just completely fucked up. I'm not immune to the occasional fuck-up, and apparently neither is Sapphiron, though I'm drawing a lot more fire for it for some reason. I don't know why I referred to aternox in the present tense. And I later pointed out that since I had gotten my facts wrong about aternox, my original plan of targeting someone who's usually more helpful and contributing would have applied perfectly to him as well.
However, that's not what I did. I went for Sapph, and then it generated a lot of interesting debate, and made Sapph the most logical target, whether I be a wolf or not.
The only time I made a comment about my English was when you referred to the word "flippant," a word which I genuinely haven't encountered that often.
I'll just go ahead and point out that no wolf in his right mind would opt for a strategy of naming his partner and being so in-everyone's-face the entire time after doing it. It's not sound strategy. The simplest strategy is the most likely to succeed.
5) You are really pushing that aternox-Laurentus partnership here, though my comments regarding it have already been made in the above point. I'll just point out that the more inconspicuous peeps are getting a free pass here if they're the Koopas, since they only have to watch us tear each other to pieces, kill someone off during the night, and then vote in some safe, predictable ways in the next day phase to win the game.
6)
Addressed in point 1.
7) "I have no qualms about your vote for Sapphiron. It is your line of reasoning used against (and for) aternox which troubles me."
This transitions into: "After his initial vote for Sapphiron, his subsequent unwillingness to look elsewhere for a worthy vote is suspect. I have tried to look at others, but there hasn't been as much material."
Talk about logical inconsistencies. You're becoming more and more suspect as I'm going on.
Even Wintermoot, who voted for me, said that Sapphiron and I are the two most suspect ones because of our strange behaviour. I admitted I would find my own behaviour suspicious were in your shoes, but I can't very well vote for myself, either as a baddie or as a townie, since it would simply hurt my cause, along with whoever I'm affiliated with. So you have a serious case of tunnel vision, at the least, because Sapphiron is the logical vote for me to make after his reaction, no matter how I'm aligned.
8. Aragonn is excellent at playing it cool and killing everyone while they don't suspect a thing. Remember WW 4.
That's both a compliment and a reason I suspect you, Aragonn.
9) You're saying that aternox is one of the Koopas because he's trying to save my by voting for Sapph? How do you explain Aragonn's vote for Sapph then? This is a clear case of conjecture and tunnel vision. We've discussed this at length in Werewolf 3.
Also, Mlfailor and Anneliese are the only two who I'm certain aren't wolves, since none of them have been online in forever. So your reasoning is really starting to slip here. There is also the problem of how this game is set up. One of the Koopas does the killing, the other one does the capturing of our seer. They both killed and captured our seer in the last night phase, meaning both were active. This is perhaps your saving grace as far as I'm concerned, since strange as it may seem, the wolves probably wouldn't make this factual mistake.
To close off, if I die, good luck to the townies.
