Post #30419
March 03, 2015, 12:15:45 AM
I'm completely against any ideology in which someone exercises aggression or violence, instigates either or both, or pushes forth any type of agenda of hatred simply because they see a person as less than them. I do also think that it goes against Wintreath's own ideology to have anyone in a position agree with that type of agenda.
At the same time, though, many of those victims have either passed on themselves, or moved on from the horrors of that time period. The only thing that prevents someone from moving on is when they're constantly reminded of it nonstop, which is why I never agree with broadcasting and rebroadcasting tragic events year after year such as with 9/11. The intention may be good, but all you're doing is reminding people that they lost loved ones, and you're constantly renewing those feelings of depression and possibly anger towards those responsible.
I see any "Nazi" group on Nationstates in the same light. I don't care what their reasoning is for calling themselves such, whether it was just in fun or they thought it cool to fashion themselves with that name. Choosing the name of a group that committed mass genocide is both being ignorant of the extent of that group's evil, and uncalled for. But the fact that Nationstates doesn't censor names like that is baffling as well, since they as a political nation-building site should know that people are going to take advantage of that.
So in short, I completely support this proposal. I think if anyone chooses to be a part of a nazi group while representing Wintreath, then there should be some kind of consequence, considering it's something that completely goes against everything Wintreath stands for.
I hate the idea of punishing for something like that, but at the same time every chosen action has a consequence, and this would just be the consequence for the action of being a part of a group named after what might as well be a massive terrorist group that murdered its own people.