View Topic

Condemn Auralia

The Security Council:

RECOGNIZING that all WA Member States have the duty to carry out in good faith their obligations to follow international law, including World Assembly resolutions;

DISMAYED that, while a member of this Assembly, Auralia routinely passed laws violating World Assembly resolutions;

ANNOYED that Auralia has encouraged other member nations' non-compliance with international laws they disagree with;

SADDENED that Auralia has abridged the rights of world citizens and advocated the destruction of the environment;

SHOCKED that Auralia authored its own commendation proposal, then submitted it via a subordinate jurisdiction, which had no legal standing as a member of this institution, thereby making a sham of the commendation process and resulting in the expulsion of both jurisdictions from the World Assembly;

CONCERNED that, since its expulsion, the nation, as the founder and controlling member of a purported coalition of nations called the World Assembly Charter Working Group, has regained membership in the WA in order to continue its efforts to decimate this institution;

OUTRAGED that said group advocates so-called "peacekeeping operations", thus allowing military action by the World Assembly, which is against everything this institution stands for;

HEREBY CONDEMNS Auralia.

Sorry I wasn't able to post these like you asked...I ended up falling asleep early last night. >_>

Quite frankly, most of these points aren't worth consideration...every nation that joins the World Assembly and is NatSov would violate several of those clauses regarding advocating for violation of World Assembly resolutions, and it's not really a cause for condemnation. Many people submit World Assembly legislation under anonymous names, and this also isn't a cause for condemnation.

The only argument that is really worth consideration is that he authored his own commendation and then submitted it via another World Assembly puppet, which was not only unethical, but also against game rules. To me, I'm not sure if that alone is cause for a condemnation...on occasion nations and regions have proposed self-commendations both transparently and legally, though not successfully. The only thing that he really did that was wrong was to use a second World Assembly puppet to hide the fact that it was a self-commendation...something that violated game rules and has already been dealt with by the game staff. I don't see the need to follow that up with World Assembly Action.

For those reasons I vote Against this proposal.

I fully agree with Wintermoot. Against.

Against

My reasoning:

Again like Winter said, pretty much every nation violates at least one WA law or resolution.