I know this is the opposite reads list of D1, but I do think Aerso and Neon look worse for the night kill on Saph. Maybe also Dawsinian.
I'm still getting over the fact that I may have self-imposed this restriction for way too long. No, I didn't get any info, scum targeted me to shut me up.
Me doing NL was because I believe LYLO is better than MYLO, yes, and I think Numbers looks good after D2.
This. This really, and I do mean really, bothers me. There's so much wrong here that I don't even know where to start. Let's just address them as they come to me.
1 - How in the blue blazes does Saph being the NK look worse for me? Or Neon? Or Dawsinian? Especially me though. I had just voted for Saph, and Saph returned an OMGUS vote on me. Zero percent chance I pull that particular trigger that night, unless I'm trying some insane power wolf strategy, which isn't out of my wheelhouse, but certainly not something I'd have had the time or energy to try overcoming while my daughter came to spend the weekend with me before school starts tomorrow. And how does it make Numbers look better? Why not bring Rag into this? That's the only name you haven't tossed out yet.
2 - "I broke my posting restriction but I think it was technically over much earlier and I misunderstood the severity of it..." - Not even sure what posting restriction you are referring to with this comment. You met the 5 post minimum D1 and D2, and you didn't exceed 20 posts N1. Scum targeted you to shut you up? You weren't silenced, merely rendered communicatively challenged. There were plenty of ways to get around that punishment. Especially if your words were transcribed 1 for 1 into new words, and repeated usage of the same word always resulted in the same resulting word being substituted. Just type a ton of gibberish words, then see what words get substituted. Now you know which word will result for a bunch of words you could possibly use. From there it's very easy to make an acrostic message. (for example: after discovering that using the word 'vote' results in 'never'; 'I' results in 'eat'; and 'Aerso' results in 'orange' you could have said Vote I Aerso Vote which would have resulted in Never Eat Orange Never. Would have been easy for us to identify the word NEON from that. It's a bit of work, but doable.
3 - You claim that you FORGOT that we were in an infected game and that's why you argue that NL wasn't optimal? Firstly, what difference does it make whether it's an infected game or not? And secondly, it was YOU who started that wagon. How in the world can you forget we're in an infected game when I spent multiple posts speculating that the cause of your speech impediment was because YOU MIGHT HAVE SCANNED AN INFECTED PERSON??
The more you say now that you can speak clearly, the more I'm beginning to suspect that you are one of the infected and are trying your best to sow confusion among our ranks. First by speaking gibberish, and now by flip flopping all of your reads. It's as if you don't want the town to feel like they can trust anyone (which I know is pretty much the norm for these games, but it's very rare to see an entire reads list flipped backwards so suddenly).
1. A kill on Saph comes from someone with site meta IMO. Saph hasn't played that much recently and hasn't played with Numbers or Rag before, unless I am mistaken. Killing a replacement player with 3 posts is super weird, unless you know that Saph is a strong player...
2. Name it "communicatively challenged" or "posting restriction", the fact is that I was restricted in what I could post. I think you have a different system in mind that I did - I used a word randomizer to transcribe words, then put them into a sheet or a "dictionary" of sorts so I could re-use the words. It wasn't just me putting messages into a machine and it outputting it 1 to 1, it was manual. And also, I did re-use the words.
3. I may have misunderstood the "infected" mechanic, but usually when you infect someone, they join the scum team. So if the scum team starts with two people and infect someone, they have 3 people. Thus, my logic that we should NL in a 4 town v 2 scum scenario wasn't correct, because, according to my thoughts at the time, it could already have been 3 v 3. I realize I was wrong about that, though, as we're here now in LYLO.
A D1 reads list is a D1 reads list. The reads aren't meant to be strong. I would have posted one for D2 if I had not been targeted and you probably would've dropped a spot or two and then by D3 you'd have dropped a bit more. But because I didn't do that, it appears to be a full 180 of my reads list.
I don't see the logic behind why I would choose to speak gibberish D2. I obviously had enough thread-control D1 to attempt to get one of the townies eliminated if I were town, a no-lynch doesn't help me whatsoever as scum - especially if I wasn't particularly scum-read to begin with.
