View Topic

I have a theory , the problem is its really tough to put it down in the thread . For some reason I believe the seer might have had checked Lau out , and it was a gimmicky move from Lau in which he asked that it was justified to get himself checked first . The concept about him being the best townie if he is one would tamper with our minds and even if seer found him as a scum , we would be hesitant to hit Lau , and by the team we go anywhere , Lau can certainly make us go a total 180. The seer can't do a soft either , so Lau will go scot free if he is scum

Lmao, is this a soft for you/Sapph as the Seer and a person who got scanned?

Town doesn't answer that . And silence is not affirmation.

Lmao, is this a soft for you/Sapph as the Seer and a person who got scanned?

I can confirm I am neither the Seer  nor am I scanned - in case his post is on the way to being interpreted as rule breach

Atm I see two things:

1. Either Lau is scum , and is pinning me down and hoping to subdue me , and ngl he has kept me busy the whole time  .

2. Sapph sees ENE and me being against Lau , and no doubt a town Lau is danger for scum team . He can use our attacks and develop a strong case , his experience definitely leaving room for that .

It has to be one of these cases , but I don't know for which I should go

Well, next Seer scan is Def going to be Sapph, it seems.

Lmao, is this a soft for you/Sapph as the Seer and a person who got scanned?

I can confirm I am neither the Seer  nor am I scanned - in case his post is on the way to being interpreted as rule breach

Is it ? 'cause Lau asked me directly and wanted me to get to a role reveal maybe

Well, next Seer scan is Def going to be Sapph, it seems.

All hail the seer!

Scum Lean
Colberius X (As mentioned by Lau if I recall correctly, nothing memorable as of yet. While this could be due to his first game since returning back, there is a difference in the level of helpfulness in scumhunting. To note this isn't a strong scum read, because I myself have been accused of not helping out much last game due to a decision to adopt a more passive playstyle and ended up being Seer)

Therefore,
Vote: Colberius X

Yeah, in comparison to my previous games, I can definitely see why my lack of helpfulness is suspicious. The activity level in this game is just overwhelming, and I don't know where to start to be in any way helpful. A week ago, I didn't even know that "scumhunting" was a term, and now I can barely keep up with the quantity of posts, much less the content.

As such, for now I will continue voting for inactives. There is high likelihood of this vote changing before EoD, but for now: Vote: Make @Hydra leave.

All hail the seer!

With all due respect, posts like this are ones that really just clog up the topic and make it unnecessarily hard to follow, without adding anything.

Well, next Seer scan is Def going to be Sapph, it seems.

If I'm not getting scanned then I'd much prefer it to be somebody like Hydra (unless they post more) if you're not wanting them to be voted. Sapphiron, if town, can probably post himself into being widely townread given time.

Something I've been deliberating: how do people feel about ENE's sudden read change on me? Anybody can feel free to chime in.

Scum Lean
Colberius X (As mentioned by Lau if I recall correctly, nothing memorable as of yet. While this could be due to his first game since returning back, there is a difference in the level of helpfulness in scumhunting. To note this isn't a strong scum read, because I myself have been accused of not helping out much last game due to a decision to adopt a more passive playstyle and ended up being Seer)

Therefore,
Vote: Colberius X

Yeah, in comparison to my previous games, I can definitely see why my lack of helpfulness is suspicious. The activity level in this game is just overwhelming, and I don't know where to start to be in any way helpful. A week ago, I didn't even know that "scumhunting" was a term, and now I can barely keep up with the quantity of posts, much less the content.

As such, for now I will continue voting for inactives. There is high likelihood of this vote changing before EoD, but for now: Vote: Make @Hydra leave.

All hail the seer!

With all due respect, posts like this are ones that really just clog up the topic and make it unnecessarily hard to follow, without adding anything.

Don't wanna start a debate , so I would stay aloof from posting things as this👍

ENE, why are you liking the post that disagrees with your statement that LoS and I think alike?

I understood the logic behind the post and liked it.

Atm I see two things:

1. Either Lau is scum , and is pinning me down and hoping to subdue me , and ngl he has kept me busy the whole time  .

2. Sapph sees ENE and me being against Lau , and no doubt a town Lau is danger for scum team . He can use our attacks and develop a strong case , his experience definitely leaving room for that .

It has to be one of these cases , but I don't know for which I should go

Not a fan of bringing me and Sapph into daggers-drawn like this. This essentially paints the picture that either one of us has to be scum while whoever is left is cleared. We could be scum pulling an epic distancing play, and we could be two Townies who have gotten wildly tunneled. There is nothing preventing one of us from being scum, of course, but that doesn't mean the remaining one is necessarily Town.

If I'm not getting scanned then I'd much prefer it to be somebody like Hydra (unless they post more) if you're not wanting them to be voted. Sapphiron, if town, can probably post himself into being widely townread given time.

I really think players who will be active adversaries or active allies to the Seer are far more valuable scan options. And Sapphiron, if scum, can probably still post himself into being widely townread given time.

Atm I see two things:

1. Either Lau is scum , and is pinning me down and hoping to subdue me , and ngl he has kept me busy the whole time  .

2. Sapph sees ENE and me being against Lau , and no doubt a town Lau is danger for scum team . He can use our attacks and develop a strong case , his experience definitely leaving room for that .

It has to be one of these cases , but I don't know for which I should go

Not a fan of bringing me and Sapph into daggers-drawn like this. This essentially paints the picture that either one of us has to be scum while whoever is left is cleared. We could be scum pulling an epic distancing play, and we could be two Townies who have gotten wildly tunneled. There is nothing preventing one of us from being scum, of course, but that doesn't mean the remaining one is necessarily Town.

No way I am going to clear anyone just like that . Everything depends on what a person posts ig.

If I'm not getting scanned then I'd much prefer it to be somebody like Hydra (unless they post more) if you're not wanting them to be voted. Sapphiron, if town, can probably post himself into being widely townread given time.

I really think players who will be active adversaries or active allies to the Seer are far more valuable scan options. And Sapphiron, if scum, can probably still post himself into being widely townread given time.

This is a fair stance (and one of the reasons I've asked to be seer checked since I doubt most players will be willing to townread me this game otherwise) but I think it's mutually incompatible with Lau not wanting to chop people who have legitimate reasons for not being present in thread (Hydra, Taul). I don't think we should be telling the seer to check players who are reasonably likely to semi-clear themselves but also refusing to consider voting players who will not be clearing themselves (regardless of how sympathetic we are to them being busy).

So tl;dr what I'm saying is we need to agree on how we should deal with low postcount players or we might end up in F3 with three players who have posted ten times between them and no way for anybody to know who randed scum in the group.