Unfortunately, you either trust me or you don't. I am not going to commit the same sin as I have done last game, allowing over-investment in the game to result in roleclaiming and rule breach. That will have to do to explain for my detached way of playing this round. You guys will find out whether you are right or wrong in lynching me soon enough.
Also, I don't believe it's that implausible for a person to be given the scum role twice in a role. You guys make it sound like Doc wasn't consecutively Wolf before.
I am more useful to Town alive than dead,
Vote: TGN
Bolded are the main hints. They were late into the day after most votes had happened, this is why the later vote shifts after these hints are the suspicious ones.
Just outta curiosity, but when you say vote shifts are suspicious do you think votes jumping into Sapph or out of Sapph are worse?
I’m a bit on the fence on what to expect from the scumteam in a scenario like this.
Because of the way this setup is designed (with Sapph being nigh-unkillable if outed as seer thanks to the two defenders) I think wolves would probably be willing to make themselves suspicious in order to push a Sapphiron lynch. If I were a wolf, I would probably be willing to sacrifice the life of my most suspicious teammate in order to lynch the cop under these circumstances.
Nothing was suspicious before the first Sapphiron soft claim post because I think making the wagons 3-3-3 was a fine decision.
Doc - Passable response, they seem to have noticed the soft but not wanted to announce it at the time and made an effort, albeit a reasonably small one.
ExLight - Not much to comment on this one tbh, null response. Relatively few Sapphiron interactions but stuck to other wagons the entire time.
TGN - Passable because they seemed pretty oblivious to it, don't like the Sapph vote but I understand it was self preservation.
Nyght - Good response, also doesn't seem to notice the soft but this time votes for BSR, which is a good look.
Wintermoot - Alarm bells here. This person probably noticed the soft and still voted. Would like to hear their thoughts on why they did this.
Kane - Oh dear. Votes Sapphiron, makes an excuse for not being able to chance his vote if Sapphiron makes a good defence and then dips. I didn't even notice this on my ISO but yikes.
BSR - Honestly the best response in the thread if we're assuming wolves were trying to lynch Sapphiron. Votes for the most viable counterwagon and tries to convince others to. If this person does flip wolf then my entire stance here is probably wrong but this reaction probably made me lean BSR as town.
Vroendal - Was pretty neutral on this until he told Anubhav to unvote, from there the response is very towny.
Anubhav - Covered this earlier but genuinely seems not to have realised what was happening. Read them town from this.
cozmikrae - What have I just witnessed happen here? Was the vote change responsible for Sapph dying. Feels like this response could have been because of wolf teammates asking them to unvote? Seems out of nowhere.
