When I look at it from a stance of actions that seem out of place, Vro's unvote at the end of the last round is still the most suspicious to me. But I'm also concerned because it seems like so much of this day has been spent talking about Vro, just like some of the early days of last game...it seems most people claim to be suspicious of him, which leads me to think that this is something wolves are getting in on to. But is it because he's a wolf his team is ready to sacrifice, or is it because in spite of all his suspicion he's town like he was last game? That's the only thing giving me pause here.
TGN has also come up this round. I don't feel his posts are out of character, but his character is so random I honestly can't even guess if he's town or a wolf.
There's been a bit of discussion this round, but it seems to be along the same lines and I don't have any strong feelings at this point either way.
Moot: got super defensive when suspicion was thrown his way.
My post was neither defensive or in response to 'suspicion thrown' my way. Ruguo just said I expanded a lot on a little for no good reason, and I legitimately wonder why people feel that way because it came up after D1 last game as well. Expanding a lot on a little is what everyone does on D1, so why is it odd that I do it?
But then how am I ever going to get the Royal Family badge?
Let it go, man.
If we were scumbuds, I wouldn't be advising him on proper conduct out in the open, I'd do it in PMs like I did the last time. At the very least, you can infer one of us isn't scum. Which I'll elaborate on later in the post (which I wrote before this, but you posted between when I started writing this and when I finished the first pass only to get told of 2 new replies, *sigh*).
Why wouldn't you be? It'd be a great way for team wolves to distance from each other...he might die for his behaviour, you could then point out just what you're pointing out now: that you publicly advised him on proper conduct. Like I told TGN, I don't think that's the case at the moment, but I also don't think you advising him makes it impossible for both of you to be wolves either.
I still feel that Michi was the better lynch for D1 for the reasons I had presented. I unvoted him to prove I was willing to listen so that he would respond in detail and voted him again when his response still failed to sufficiently satisfy me. I apologize for the last minute unvote, it was rather poor form. However, you can tell that it was a genuine last moment decision because I unvoted instead of voting a vanity wagon and saving myself the mandatory task of voting someone today.
I got cold feet because of my own usual paranoia, but mostly because of the amount of players saying they were uncomfortable in his lynch. I trust in the players who have played with Michi longer than myself in reasoning behind his alignment. However, I still suspected him and wasn't being pinged about Hapi's innocence, so I left it to a coinflip and hoped for the best. Those who voted Hapi in the first place put her in the position to be lynched, I just didn't stand in its way. My actions one can argue have been the more genuine for being confusing.
You voted for him, then you didn't...you unvoted him because you trusted in the other players, yet you still feel he was the better lynch for D1, yet that was exactly what was going to happen until you unvoted him...
I have to admit, I'm confused just reading your post.
