View Topic

The current vote count is:
Vroendal - 1 (Laurentus)
Wille-Harlia - 1 (Vroendal)
HumanSanity - 1 (Doc)
Wischland - 1 (Hapi)
Flying Eagles - 1 (Gerrick)

@turtle, @HumanSanity, and @BraveSirRobin need to vote this day phase or they will be lynched for inactivity (missing two votes in a row).

Yes I'm concurring with Lau, Vote: Vroendal

But how much more time do we have?

Until 12 PM PST tomorrow, so roughly 15 hours.

ONLY 15 HOURS? idk who to vote for. how many no lynch's do I have?

But I'm not sure if that carries over to this game. FE's posts haven't really gained any traction nor do the arguments seem to align with anyone player. The only thing I'm seeing is that he voted for you, Vro, after Lau did, and when Lau switched to Michi, so did FE. But FE also targeted Lau earlier, without much success. So maybe Lau is really the genius mastermind and has fooled us all. Or maybe FE is just making questionable posts because he's not really sure what's happening and doesn't have the same time to consider things as he did in the XKI WW game.

Well I'm going to keep trying to analyze this nonsense. Maybe I'll come up with something better.

I can see how you might equate Lau to Tuga especially since I didn't specify what I meant, but I'm not. I really really don't think it's Lau at this point just based on how he's posting, and with how BSR is saying that he has mechanically cleared Lau it really doesn't seem to be an option at all. :p That's one of the scummiest things you've said this game to me, though I suppose a wolf would be more likely to remember who's clearing who.

I think based on the parallels and dissimilarities in posting style that Flying is now suspicious enough to be properly wagoned. If you follow with my theory that at least most of the wolves are much more inactive, it would make sense that Flying would follow along with the game without a very clear mastermind such as the likes of Lau,  enough to merge into the background and coming up here and there to jump on a suspicion or thought someone has already stated. (If you ISO all his posts by clicking on his profile and "show posts" you might see what I mean.)

@Minish if you're not willing to go for Willie (hehe), would you be alright with a Flying vote as opposed to ENE and ogun? I'm fine with letting Willie go since the town is so split :/ I'm aware that my suspicious nature will make people unlikely to join my Willie wagon, and we need to set up someone along with me. If I'm wrong and Flying really is too wolfie to be a wolf, I will be unhappy but at least it will remove one more suspicion from this game.

Thank you for sharing this info with us Wisch, it was quite illuminating.

And thank you Sapph, that is quite interesting.
Hapi, oh Hapi... frankly I've been avoiding responding to your post. Suffice it to say that as a final gambit I can easily make Minish at least aware of my role without breaking any rules if I'm on the line and really want to survive.

@Laurentus Analysis of this?  If he can rope Minish in and this isn't a bluff we could go with a different scum core this round?  I'm not certain

Also Minish, with respect to your idea that information could be gleaned from players who may be hobbits and good pals if one of them kicks the bucket, I can with quite... reasonable accuracy state that might not be a great assumption to make.  lol

That being said we could hedge our bets, and go for ENE or ogun because that's who he seems to be protecting, then see if Wisch verifies who he is/isn't?  Also have we figured out who Wisch is as far as the fellowship goes yet?  Apologies if we have and I didn't see the post

Minish NOT Wisch.  No idea why I confused those names.  I guess they're phonetically similar

At this point, if y'all wanna go off on the inactives, have at it, but I'm sticking to my guns on Vro. If he's forced to share some sort of info with Minish, and she clears him, then I might reconsider.

@Sapphiron, what is your plan for the day?

Let's just waste another day *sighs*

Actually, let's dispense with the paranoia: @Red Mones or @Ruguo, should a player ever change alignment, that would reflect in the scum count, would it not?

Follow-up question: as of this moment, what is the scum count?

Actually, let's dispense with the paranoia: @Red Mones or @Ruguo, should a player ever change alignment, that would reflect in the scum count, would it not?

Follow-up question: as of this moment, what is the scum count?

Why would you think it would? That would make it quite frankly obvious the moment it happened?

Because not doing so would make it unfair to Town, too.

Frankly, the more everyone tinfoil's Daws, the more suspicious I'm becoming.

And why exactly are you so desperate to shoot holes in this theory? Was I asking you, Hapi?