View Topic

Hey look my wagon has support.

One thing we haven't even discussed is that nobody died last night and how or why that might be so I'm gonna need some quick clarification don't kill anyone yet please

What are you expecting here? That a defender is just gonna come out and say "oh, hey, I protected this person?"

Maybe who knows though first I need clarification if someone could hypothetically say that

No, the rules forbid you from doing it.

Er. @Adorable Oracle Hapi, did Rohan answer the call?

Okay you asked me to trust you earlier I will ask you to trust me now.  Don't kill Michi.

Well, seeing as how I need to vote for either Vroendal or Michi to save myself... Hard choice, though, as both are among my scum-leans.

Vote: Vroendal. I don't buy his reasoning on making the Dawsinian wagon a majority. Why was he more confident in making the kill for Dawsinian over the other two, or rather make a four-way tie similarly to what I had done? Also, he's playing quite similarly to the Portal Werewolf game where he was a wolf. In that game, he also voted for a random, non-wagon player in such a circumstance as this.

Okay you asked me to trust you earlier I will ask you to trust me now.  Don't kill Michi.

Okay so here's my problem: I Towned Gerrick for the same reason you're asking me not to kill Michi.

Town Lean: HumanSanity, Gerrick, Dawsinian, Doc

Found something intriguing - Can you explain how did you categorise Sanity under "Town Lean" when most people are reading nothing much into people engaging in minimal activity? And a bit more explanation on Gerrick and Doc would be great.

Admittedly the choice on HS is a bit more of a meta thing here.  I've played games with him in the past in XKI, and his posts along with the fact that he's usually busy with delegate stuff seems pretty in character for him as a townie so far.

Gerrick, I can see where he's coming from on his posts.  I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt that his vote in the last phase was purely just to keep the tie going rather than voting for myself or Lau.  Is it possible he's lying and playing a good game? Always, but I'm putting faith in him for now.

Doc, I'm more trusting Lau on this one since Lau is one of my town core people.  He seems like he's putting faith in Doc being more of a town lean, so I'm following that for now, but it can always change depending on how things progress.

Well, seeing as how I need to vote for either Vroendal or Michi to save myself... Hard choice, though, as both are among my scum-leans.

Vote: Vroendal. I don't buy his reasoning on making the Dawsinian wagon a majority. Why was he more confident in making the kill for Dawsinian over the other two, or rather make a four-way tie similarly to what I had done? Also, he's playing quite similarly to the Portal Werewolf game where he was a wolf. In that game, he also voted for a random, non-wagon player in such a circumstance as this.

I understand voting me to save yourself. However, I find it rather ironic that you would question my reason for voting Daws as opposed to forming another tie, as I had cited your reasons. I didn't want a tie bc that was still a chance of killing Lau/Michi. I would also like to remind you that in the Portal game I was purposefully setting myself up to be lynched, following my role. This is a new game and an entirely different situation.

Okay so here's my problem: I Towned Gerrick for the same reason you're asking me not to kill Michi.

Am I missing something here or are you guys literally discussing night actions or sharing mason-esque information

Okay you asked me to trust you earlier I will ask you to trust me now.  Don't kill Michi.

Okay so here's my problem: I Towned Gerrick for the same reason you're asking me not to kill Michi.

Well I have been saying Gerrick is wolf.

Anyways. I could be lying I'm not saying I did anything I'm not breaking rules I'm just saying I have reason to be wary of killing Michi.

Ride into mordor with me as I would you.

And if I am breaking rules feel free to modslap me.

I understand voting me to save yourself. However, I find it rather ironic that you would question my reason for voting Daws as opposed to forming another tie, as I had cited your reasons. I didn't want a tie bc that was still a chance of killing Lau/Michi. I would also like to remind you that in the Portal game I was purposefully setting myself up to be lynched, following my role. This is a new game and an entirely different situation.

I was confident enough in Dawsinian to put him as a 33% chance to die. You put him as 100% chance. I was nowhere near confident enough to do that, let alone put anyone at that, which is why I didn't vote Michi in that situation, although I was definitely thinking about it.

Also, why did you want to save both Laurentus and Michi that badly? I can understand Lau, but why Michi?

I understand voting me to save yourself. However, I find it rather ironic that you would question my reason for voting Daws as opposed to forming another tie, as I had cited your reasons. I didn't want a tie bc that was still a chance of killing Lau/Michi. I would also like to remind you that in the Portal game I was purposefully setting myself up to be lynched, following my role. This is a new game and an entirely different situation.

I was confident enough in Dawsinian to put him as a 33% chance to die. You put him as 100% chance. I was nowhere near confident enough to do that, let alone put anyone at that, which is why I didn't vote Michi in that situation, although I was definitely thinking about it.

Also, why did you want to save both Laurentus and Michi that badly? I can understand Lau, but why Michi?

Hang on a second. You specifically said yesterday that you didn't feel Vro was an confident as I was portraying him.

What?

I was confident enough in Dawsinian to put him as a 33% chance to die. You put him as 100% chance. I was nowhere near confident enough to do that, let alone put anyone at that, which is why I didn't vote Michi in that situation, although I was definitely thinking about it.

Also, why did you want to save both Laurentus and Michi that badly? I can understand Lau, but why Michi?

I wasn't confident in his guilt at all, I just deemed it the necessary thing to do to minimize what seemed to me to be obvious damage to the town.
As I've stated before, I'm just really not feeling that Michi's guilty from the quality and frequency of his posts. I expect him to play a much more invested game as scum and frankly I have not observed anywhere near to the levels of that. I'm not completely discounting the possibility, just am finding it highly highly unlikely.