And I'll point out that your logic for thinking Moot must be Town is not great. Sapphiron made a pretty good argument that he's neutral.
... Of course, if you think I'm sus, I'm guessing you also don't put much stock in my clue.
@Sapphiron, this raises a few questions, though. Why did you hint at Batman being suspicious if he did indeed send you a message?
Sorry, I wasn't thinking straight and saw a few things that made feel susp, but I realize now that you wouldn't be. And my logic about Wintermoot is flawed, I realized. Also, the messages are anonymous, so Sapphiron
didn't know it was me.
Lol, good choice, lad, as I'm kinda dying at the end of this phase.
Why Pengu and not Kane, though?
It seems pretty straightforward that Pengu is evil, as they were revealed to be poisoner by a pretty confirmed town, and nobody has died from poison for the whole game.
Your logic is confusing. Red Mones was the confirmed "evil Poisoner" and was lynched, with Laurentus confirming he was poisoned and is dying this phase.
If I was also an "evil poisoner" then it'd make no sense why more people weren't dying from poison.
Some of the logic being pushed is also based on the victim choices when most of the players are Wintreath Werewolf vets and/or were even part of the previous game. Almost everyone here knows the top players for scum to be wary of, in part because Laurentus will remind everyone in most games who those players are. You really think players like Moot or Excal or even Barnes wouldn't take note of the fact that Hydra or Tau aren't big scum threats when you have someone pointing it out all the time whenever they get lynched? Seriously, over time it becomes less of a "members of House Valeria knowing who to take down" type of thing and more of a general scum strategy when you continuously point out that "House Valeria members know to take out so and so because they're threats." Because that explanation is almos becoming a game trope that non Valerians can easily take advantage of.
But the fact of the matter is, I didn't successfully poison anyone. I specifically stated that my poison retaliation when protecting someone was purely chance rather than definite (unless Cake is in effect and makes it definite because of the joke of cake making people gassy). I've only had one successful defense (Laurentus), and unfortunately I didn't get the message that I succesfully hit a scum with poison.
The logic behind my "successful poison" was because Laurentus' clue was an empty can of Neurotoxin when if anything, that was more than likely just flavor to hint at my being a poisonous gas.
Overall, I'm a little amazed how this bandwagon even started using past game logic and using the "validity" of my role based on someone elses' ultimatums that I never even suggested on the first place, on top of a clue that could be taken multiple ways anyways.
All that being said, I'm also surprised people are getting on the Kane bandwagon if he's indeed the Morality Core, since the Morality Core in Portal 1 was what damped GlaDos' evil tendencies to where she couldn't even use her rocket launchers because the Morality Core restricted it.
Since it was more Laurentus that hinted it with the clue (since the Morality Core is the only one with a purple eye), I'm going to give Kane the benefit of the doubt for now.
That being said, I'm also going to
Vote: Wintermoot because he's a Werewolf vet that would know the ins and outs and who to target to throw off suspicion to himself...and he's been a little less active than he normally is, and that's saying something since he can be quiet, but he's never this quiet. I'm surprised people are thinking he's neutral when it'd make more sense for Sapph to be the neutral one since he was added after the game had already started.
