View Topic

Wintermoot puts his player hat back on.

What I find interesting is that I'm inclined to believe you and that scares me...
The problem with your claim is that no one can prove it, which would be rather convenient for a turret don't you think?

If you continue on the assumption that you're innocent, who do you think should be lynched, Aragonn, Gerrick, Pengu, or none of them?

What I find interesting is that in this round alone you've implicated a number of people as turret without giving any real reason or sticking to what others have already said: myself, Hydra, Excalibur, Red Mones, and Gerrick. It's like it keeps you active enough not to stand out for being conspicuously quiet, yet it keeps you uninvolved  enough not to be seen as the driving force behind any particular lynching.

If I've missed something here, I apologize, but is there any reason to suspect Gerrick besides the fact that he voted for Hapi on the very first day?

With all of the resignations and inactives, as well as the player tensions, I'm worried we might have to declare a mistrial of sorts.

Wintermoot puts his player hat back on.
What I find interesting is that in this round alone you've implicated a number of people as turret without giving any real reason or sticking to what others have already said: myself, Hydra, Excalibur, Red Mones, and Gerrick. It's like it keeps you active enough not to stand out for being conspicuously quiet, yet it keeps you uninvolved  enough not to be seen as the driving force behind any particular lynching.

If I've missed something here, I apologize, but is there any reason to suspect Gerrick besides the fact that he voted for Hapi on the very first day?

I was wondering when someone was going to point that out. It's interesting that you were the one who went for it. The reason I did what I did in that way was simply because I trust absolutely none of you. I recognize that the only leads on players we have are based on conjecture, I am not experienced enough to make formal judgements in this game, and I am observing how everyone reacts to my actions. What I really want is for people to participate in order to reveal more about themselves. I know that none of you know exactly if I am core or turret, but you can judge by the reasoning I have laid out so far that I am interested in putting as much information out as possible, which as far as I know is traditionally a townie play, the turrets already knowing who each other are, and wanting information to be hidden. I hope that answers your question.

In answer to your question, no there is not any other reason. I'm just going through the list trying to get people to talk. The turrets have escaped being caught for a ridiculously long time, so I want to look in places that seem safe.

I just want to go across the bridge. Just send me across the bridge.

Of course there's a chance I'm scum. Like. There's a chance anyone here is scum.

Also, we believed Ex because he gave details of his role. Which also got him killed. So don't do that, but also don't expect us just to take your word for things, @Excalibur.

it's equally likely ex protected a NK target, such as you or pengu.

Oh, and @lil g you should vote someone else to go across the bridge since Hapi is leaving. At this point, I think I should go as I still want the core, turret, and unknown to go across and I don't trust anyone else.

bridge vote: red mones


i still think the jailer clue points to hydra. no one can answer me on why the clue exists if it doesn't point to a player. if it doesn't point to a player then it isn't helpful so why is it considered a perk and why does it exist? that's my logic

although if there's a wagon on another player i suspect, i'm willing to switch probably

bridge vote: red mones

i forgot to bold my vote oops

With all of the resignations and inactives, as well as the player tensions, I'm worried we might have to declare a mistrial of sorts.

You and me both.

With all of the resignations and inactives, as well as the player tensions, I'm worried we might have to declare a mistrial of sorts.

You and me both.

Thirded on that.

With all of the resignations and inactives, as well as the player tensions, I'm worried we might have to declare a mistrial of sorts.

You and me both.

I really hope it doesn't have to come to that. Ruguo has done an incredible job on this game and the last thing I want is for anyone to feel that it wasn't worth it... that would be awful. Though there have been high tensions I think we can still continue if everyone pulls together to see it through.

I've honestly been fatigued by the whole experience at this point. I just wanted Silv to have a nice, massive game where all of us could have weeks of fun, and I wanted all the different communities that got together to have a great time too.

My heart is not in this anymore.

Alright Folks, serious time now.

How many people actually want to keep going?
I see this going down one of three ways from this point on.

1) We keep going as is and just see this thing through, regardless of people leaving and tensions running really high. I don't see this going well.

2) We take a break and come back to this when people are cooled off, and ready to try again with fresh eyes.

3) We end the game here. No conclusion, no fuss, it just stops.

I'm open to other ideas. Let me know what you think. The game is officially on pause until we sort this matter out.

I know for a fact that if we take option 2, we won't come back. People don't do that. So we have 1 and 3. People as a majority seem to be in favor of 3. I really don't want you to feel that this was all for nothing. I think the decision really lies with you. If you're done with it, we'll stop. If you feel like continuing, I for one will continue.

I’ve put a lot of effort into this game, I don’t want to quit. I personally would like to continue. (Also option 2 will end up like Werewolf 20)

Agreed. Option 2 never pans out.

I'm just over this. I choose option 3.