Sorry I'm late to the conversation. This week has hit me harder than I imagined and will be busy for the time being.
Here's my thoughts so far: Gerrick: Nothing seems off in my book so far. His initial vote for Aragonn was a joke vote (unfortunately), but sticking to it throughout the end despite my pleas is a reasonable move to make given that it really was going to be a game of blind trust to see if he should vote for Aragonn or Laurentus. Either way would've given us more information to work with and that is ultimately what we needed.
Doc: If I was a wolf, I would've just kept silent and let Aragonn be lynched. Even though it ultimately may lead to the same result (Laurentus getting lynched this round), it allows Laurentus more time to deliberate targets, possible power roles, etc. It doesn't seem like a play Laurentus would make to ensure innocence, especially so last minute.
Red Mones: Going off train of thought makes sense. For now. The constant flipping makes him too wolfy to be a wolf at this point in my book.
El Fiji Grande: Interesting analysis to point towards Gerrick. Not sure if I'm buying it just yet. Why weren't you this analytical/active in previous rounds? As I mentioned in my previous post, I don't like your vote for Melehan. Based off Laurentus' past wolf games, this vote seems like something Laurentus would direct to hide a wolf. This vanity wagon strikes as suspicious to me.
Ruguo: No huge bells are going off for me just yet.
@Gerrick Could you elaborate on "Somehow knew either Doc and/or Laurentus was a wolf"? Just like Gerrick, makes sense to stick to the gut to gain information. Not sure if I would've trusted my own reasoning/pleas either.
Kane: Seems alright for now. As Gerrick stated, seems to be trying not to rock the boat.
Wintermoot: Seems like a townie. Stuck up for Aragonn and saw through Laurentus' actions which thankfully was the right choice. I can't discount that it may be a ploy to hide among town though.
HappySpin: As mentioned in my previous post, they've been has been awfully quiet ever since starting their vote for me. As an "experienced player," with all that's happened, a townie would usually contribute more, especially one who wanted to perform a reaction test on me. Why didn't you act on this reaction test? Why didn't you vote differently after all the events between Laurentus and Aragonn unfolded? There's just too many questions.
Melehan: Voting and reasoning was interesting to follow. However, given Aragonn's accusations, I don't blame you. Then again, I don't really know how you play, and if Ruguo says it's just Melehan being Melehan, I'll let that be for now.
Thus, I will
Vote: El Fiji Grande. Their actions (and timing of actions in the previous round), coupled with burst of activity this round, just seem to be something that Laurentus would direct.