View Topic

@Red Mones
Reminder to please nominate 4 people for Mission 2.

Doc has a point about North, especially as Doc probably has the most experience with this game (while North and I have close to none). However, that makes Doc suspicious as well just because of his experience. That being said, North brings up a good point; for now, we'll just have to play it safe.

Huh so should we nominate a completely different crowd?  The tricky part here is that it would appear someone can always defect and decide to sabotage the dish, whereas in stuff like Secret Hitler there are only two folks in each cabinet so its much easier to form opinions about individuals. 

Other suggestions?

@Red Mones

If Mones doesn't respond in the near future, what's the plan? Skip him?

If Mones doesn't respond in the near future, what's the plan? Skip him?

I think I might bump him down one in the order if that's the case, yeah.

All the players in this game are fairly consistently online (if not here then on Discord) so I didn't anticipate this happening very much, but if Mones still doesn't return perhaps we remove him from the game and potentially reassign a role to maintain the correct ratio?

Still figuring this out as we go.

Okay, so it's been two and a half days since the start of this phase. Red Mones has been offline for almost three days now. Unfortunately he doesn't have a Discord so I can't try contacting him there.

We'll be moving on and returning to him as the leader when he returns.

@Gabrielle, please nominate the next group of 4 people to tackle Mission 2.

I see a lot of suspicious behavior goin' on in here. I am def choosing @North, @Doc, @Hydra, and to make things interesting... @Marzipan? 

You do realuzr you just assured a nothrr failutr, right?

You do realuzr you just assured a nothrr failutr, right?

^^^this

Also we can vote no so I think we're probably fine

Why would you go with the exact same group that just caused a failure?
It's one thing to take a couple people from the group if you're particularly suspicious about one individual, but all of us?

Vote: NO.

@Marzipan @Red Mones @Gabrielle @BraveSirRobin @North @Gerrick @A self deprecating Kane @Doc @Hydra

Your nomination, from Gabrielle, is currently North, Doc, Hydra, and Marzipan. Please discuss and vote.

I will allow a re-nomination from Gabrielle if it occurs before the vote closes.

I'm going to have to say no to this group.

I Vote: No as well.

I will also vote no.