View Topic

Yup.

Can the Kringle brothers target the same person at the same time?

I've never had that question before, but I suppose so.  But that might be a waste of their possibility of protecting 2 people, and it doesn't up the success rate...it's still a 50% success rate for both attempts

That would be a 75% success rate though

Sapph gets it.

It's a 75% chance, sure, but if the person is so important to protect, recognize that that's a 75% chance to protect in one round, and a 0% chance in the other round, because they cannot protect the same person in consecutive rounds. If the Jollis really do target that person, and fail, they're likely to just target them again the next round, in which case it's game over for that guy.
Conversely, having each brother protect that person in consecutive rounds has a 50% chance of being protected in each round. I like that idea a lot better.

Are we lynching this round?


~ Lynch early, lynch often.

Oh, shit, I just realised people haven't voted, so unless at least two people vote to lynch no one, then Doc will get lynched. I'm thinking I may have to change my vote.

I also see a lot of people have responded, but only one person has actually sat down to cast a vote.

We didn't lynch last game, so I wasn't clear whether that was a local rule.

I'll vote Hydra for inactivity so far.

Aw, fuck.
Well in the interest of preserving myself without accusing someone completely at random, I Vote: Nobody.

I willVote: No Lytch as there is no evidence.

This may be a waste of my no lynch vote, but seeing as there is no evidence against anyone I Vote: No Lynch.

I suppose I will vote no lynch as well.

I shall continue the trend with a vote of : No Lynch

Hydra has still yet to post... But I suppose since it's likely to win anyway, I'll go ahead and

Vote: No Lynch

Welp, considering there's a clear majority of no lynches, I'm going to keep my one-time no lynch vote for the future, and just take an inactivity frowny face this round.