Pages: [1] 2

[DRAFT] Speaker Election Ammendment Act
Posts: 22 Views: 1708

Arenado
  • Citizen
  • Some Random Guy
  • Quote
    Title
    1) This act shall be titled the "Speaker Election Amendment Act".

    Amendments and Additions:
    2) The "Procedural Rules of the Underhusen Act" shall be amended to add a section 8 (c) which shall read as follows:
    Quote
    8. (c): Should, after 3 ballots, the election for Speaker remain tied then The Monarch shall have the tie breaking vote for Speaker.

    Something to close a potential loophole with Speaker Elections.
    1 person likes this post: Syraj
    I Hope You Have A Nice Day :]
    Arenado
    • Some Random Guy
    • Posts: 5,557
    • Karma: 2,209
    • Comfortably Numb
    • Citizen
    • Pronouns
      Any/All or They/Them
      Familial House
      Eske
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Syraj
  • Former Citizen
  • Yep, that sounds good.
    Résumé

    Citizen: 23 June - Present,
    Wintreath's Finest July 2018,
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the 29th, 30th and 31st Underhusen,
    RP Guild Rank: Layman
    Ambassador to Hartfelden: 11 October -
    Present,
    Thane of Roleplay, December 2018 - Present.
    Syraj
    • Posts: 363
    • Karma: 122
    • I am totally not sleazy. My products are top quality.
    • Former Citizen
    • Familial House
      Kaizer
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Syraj
  • Former Citizen
  • Found an error. Let's take an example underhusen of a, b, c, d:
    1st election: tie a and b
    2nd: tie b and c
    3rd: tie c and d.
    Who can the monarch vote for?
    Résumé

    Citizen: 23 June - Present,
    Wintreath's Finest July 2018,
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the 29th, 30th and 31st Underhusen,
    RP Guild Rank: Layman
    Ambassador to Hartfelden: 11 October -
    Present,
    Thane of Roleplay, December 2018 - Present.
    Syraj
    • Posts: 363
    • Karma: 122
    • I am totally not sleazy. My products are top quality.
    • Former Citizen
    • Familial House
      Kaizer
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Arenado
  • Citizen
  • Some Random Guy
  • Whomever he wants from the third ballot. He gets the tie breaking vote.
    I Hope You Have A Nice Day :]
    Arenado
    • Some Random Guy
    • Posts: 5,557
    • Karma: 2,209
    • Comfortably Numb
    • Citizen
    • Pronouns
      Any/All or They/Them
      Familial House
      Eske
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Syraj
  • Former Citizen
  • Whomever he wants from the third ballot. He gets the tie breaking vote.
    Then you should specify this in the document.
    Résumé

    Citizen: 23 June - Present,
    Wintreath's Finest July 2018,
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the 29th, 30th and 31st Underhusen,
    RP Guild Rank: Layman
    Ambassador to Hartfelden: 11 October -
    Present,
    Thane of Roleplay, December 2018 - Present.
    Syraj
    • Posts: 363
    • Karma: 122
    • I am totally not sleazy. My products are top quality.
    • Former Citizen
    • Familial House
      Kaizer
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Arenado
  • Citizen
  • Some Random Guy
  • Quote
    Title
    1) This act shall be titled the "Speaker Election Amendment Act".

    Amendments and Additions:
    2) The "Procedural Rules of the Underhusen Act" shall be amended to add a section 8 (c) which shall read as follows:
    Quote
    8. (c): Should, after 3 ballots, the election for Speaker remain tied then The Monarch shall have the tie breaking vote for Speaker in the third ballot.
    1 person likes this post: Syraj
    I Hope You Have A Nice Day :]
    Arenado
    • Some Random Guy
    • Posts: 5,557
    • Karma: 2,209
    • Comfortably Numb
    • Citizen
    • Pronouns
      Any/All or They/Them
      Familial House
      Eske
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Katie
  • Former Citizen
  • The Cheese
  • I'm a bit confused both at Syraj's analogy and how North's solution fixes that analogy. Isn't there only one ballot? What happens if more than 2 people tie?
    1 person likes this post: taulover
    Lady Katherine Ostergaard
    Countess of Osterfell, Matriarch of the Noble House of Ostergaard


    Resumé
    Contact
    Discord: Katie#3933

    Wintreath
      • Fmr. Thane of WA Affairs
      • Fmr. Jarl of Foreign Affairs
      • Fmr. Skrifa in the 29th-34th & 36th Sessions of the Underhusen
      • Fmr. Officer of Information in the 29th-34th Sessions of the Underhusen
      • Fmr. Speaker Pro Tempore in the 33rd Underhusen
      • Fmr. Thane of Integration
      • Fmr. Thane of Embassies

    Other
    • Fmr. Councillor of World Assembly Affairs in Cynosure
    • Fmr. Outreach Officer of the Rejected Realms
    • Fmr. Kaetunet of the 1st House of Commons of the Holy Reich of Bunicken
    • Fmr. Grand Councillor in Grand Central
    • Fmr. Local Councillor in the South Pacific
    Katie
    • The Cheese
    • Posts: 730
    • Karma: 722
    • hoh
    • Former Citizen
    • Pronouns
      She/Her/Hers
      Familial House
      Ostergaard
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Syraj
  • Former Citizen
  • I'm a bit confused both at Syraj's analogy and how North's solution fixes that analogy. Isn't there only one ballot? What happens if more than 2 people tie?
    Currently, the law says if there is a tie, then elections shall just continue. The amendment says that after the 3rd election, the monarch will pick one of the tied members from the 3rd ballot to be speaker. North's solution defines who can be picked by the monarch, and the monarch can pick one person, no matter the number of candidates. I hope this answers your question.
    Résumé

    Citizen: 23 June - Present,
    Wintreath's Finest July 2018,
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the 29th, 30th and 31st Underhusen,
    RP Guild Rank: Layman
    Ambassador to Hartfelden: 11 October -
    Present,
    Thane of Roleplay, December 2018 - Present.
    Syraj
    • Posts: 363
    • Karma: 122
    • I am totally not sleazy. My products are top quality.
    • Former Citizen
    • Familial House
      Kaizer
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Katie
  • Former Citizen
  • The Cheese
  • I'm a bit confused both at Syraj's analogy and how North's solution fixes that analogy. Isn't there only one ballot? What happens if more than 2 people tie?
    Currently, the law says if there is a tie, then elections shall just continue. The amendment says that after the 3rd election, the monarch will pick one of the tied members from the 3rd ballot to be speaker. North's solution defines who can be picked by the monarch, and the monarch can pick one person, no matter the number of candidates. I hope this answers your question.

    What precedent is there for having multiple election rounds? Sure we could implement that, but I don’t remember reading anything about more than one ballot.
    1 person likes this post: taulover
    Lady Katherine Ostergaard
    Countess of Osterfell, Matriarch of the Noble House of Ostergaard


    Resumé
    Contact
    Discord: Katie#3933

    Wintreath
      • Fmr. Thane of WA Affairs
      • Fmr. Jarl of Foreign Affairs
      • Fmr. Skrifa in the 29th-34th & 36th Sessions of the Underhusen
      • Fmr. Officer of Information in the 29th-34th Sessions of the Underhusen
      • Fmr. Speaker Pro Tempore in the 33rd Underhusen
      • Fmr. Thane of Integration
      • Fmr. Thane of Embassies

    Other
    • Fmr. Councillor of World Assembly Affairs in Cynosure
    • Fmr. Outreach Officer of the Rejected Realms
    • Fmr. Kaetunet of the 1st House of Commons of the Holy Reich of Bunicken
    • Fmr. Grand Councillor in Grand Central
    • Fmr. Local Councillor in the South Pacific
    Katie
    • The Cheese
    • Posts: 730
    • Karma: 722
    • hoh
    • Former Citizen
    • Pronouns
      She/Her/Hers
      Familial House
      Ostergaard
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Arenado
  • Citizen
  • Some Random Guy
  • Quote
    Title
    1) This act shall be titled the "Speaker Election Amendment Act".

    Amendments and Additions:
    2) The "Procedural Rules of the Underhusen Act" shall be amended to add a section 8 (c) which shall read as follows:
    Quote
    8. (c): Should, after 5 days from the beginning of the Speaker Election, the election for Speaker remain tied then The Monarch shall have the tie breaking vote for Speaker.

    What about this?
    I Hope You Have A Nice Day :]
    Arenado
    • Some Random Guy
    • Posts: 5,557
    • Karma: 2,209
    • Comfortably Numb
    • Citizen
    • Pronouns
      Any/All or They/Them
      Familial House
      Eske
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Chanku
  • Citizen
  • I do have some worries about the legality of this solution. The Fundamental Laws requires that the Underhusen elects one of its own. While the exact Procedure is left up in the air, the Monarch is not, and can not, be of the Underhusen.
    See you later space cowboy.
    Old Signature

     
    Current Positions in Wintreath
    Matriarch of House Kaizer
    Speaker of the 29th Underhusen
    Advisor to the Riksråd
    Positions I've held
    Riksrad(1st Jarl of Information, 3rd Jarl of Foreign Affairs, 2nd Jarl of Defense)
    Member of the WHR
    Speaker of the Underhusen (3rd)
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the Underhusen (1st)
    Underhusen Member (1st-3rd)
    Member of the 5th Overhusen
    Chairman of the 5th Overhusen
    6th Underhusen
    Speaker of the 6th Underhusen
    Mandate Holder for Jarl of Defense
    Member of the 8th Storting (Underhusen)
    Royalty of Wintreath
    Ambassador for the Department of Foreign Affairs.
    Underhusen Terms I've been a part of
    1st Underhusen
    2nd Underhusen
    3rd Underhusen
    6th Underhusen
    8th Underhusen
    Overhusen Terms I've been a part of
    5th Overhusen
    Families I've been a part of
    Kaizer - Matriarch (REFORMED)
    Kestar - Child of Wintermoot (REMOVED)
    Chanku
    Arenado
  • Citizen
  • Some Random Guy
  • Yes, and most of the time the Underhusen does elect one of its own. This is for when they cannot. The legal issue does not seem to hold much water since, as you said, the procedure is left up in the air.
    I Hope You Have A Nice Day :]
    Arenado
    • Some Random Guy
    • Posts: 5,557
    • Karma: 2,209
    • Comfortably Numb
    • Citizen
    • Pronouns
      Any/All or They/Them
      Familial House
      Eske
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Katie
  • Former Citizen
  • The Cheese
  • Wait what? What possible situation would the Underhusen not be able to elect one of its own? We could just invalidate the final vote if there is a tie, or give the overhusen tie-breaking powers. I don't think giving a free vote to someone who isn't even in the Underhusen makes any sense.
    Lady Katherine Ostergaard
    Countess of Osterfell, Matriarch of the Noble House of Ostergaard


    Resumé
    Contact
    Discord: Katie#3933

    Wintreath
      • Fmr. Thane of WA Affairs
      • Fmr. Jarl of Foreign Affairs
      • Fmr. Skrifa in the 29th-34th & 36th Sessions of the Underhusen
      • Fmr. Officer of Information in the 29th-34th Sessions of the Underhusen
      • Fmr. Speaker Pro Tempore in the 33rd Underhusen
      • Fmr. Thane of Integration
      • Fmr. Thane of Embassies

    Other
    • Fmr. Councillor of World Assembly Affairs in Cynosure
    • Fmr. Outreach Officer of the Rejected Realms
    • Fmr. Kaetunet of the 1st House of Commons of the Holy Reich of Bunicken
    • Fmr. Grand Councillor in Grand Central
    • Fmr. Local Councillor in the South Pacific
    Katie
    • The Cheese
    • Posts: 730
    • Karma: 722
    • hoh
    • Former Citizen
    • Pronouns
      She/Her/Hers
      Familial House
      Ostergaard
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Arenado
  • Citizen
  • Some Random Guy
  • But a member of the Underhusen is still going to be the Speaker. Nothing about that has changed. When I said that most of the time they do, I was referencing the possibility I am trying to fix, an unbreakable tie vote. If we invalidate the final vote in the event of a tie, then nothing is changed and another vote will have to happen.

    Another ballot, if you will.

    And if you do not want to give a tie breaking vote to someone who is not in the UH, why would giving a tie breaking vote to the entire OH be better?

    And we are not giving a free vote to some random guy, we are giving the tie breaking vote to the Monarch. In my opinion, no one else would be suitable.
    1 person likes this post: Katie
    I Hope You Have A Nice Day :]
    Arenado
    • Some Random Guy
    • Posts: 5,557
    • Karma: 2,209
    • Comfortably Numb
    • Citizen
    • Pronouns
      Any/All or They/Them
      Familial House
      Eske
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Syraj
  • Former Citizen
  • I do have some worries about the legality of this solution. The Fundamental Laws requires that the Underhusen elects one of its own. While the exact Procedure is left up in the air, the Monarch is not, and can not, be of the Underhusen.
    I agree with you here. This cannot be done because the monarch is not part of the Underhusen. Can you think of another solution, though?
    Résumé

    Citizen: 23 June - Present,
    Wintreath's Finest July 2018,
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the 29th, 30th and 31st Underhusen,
    RP Guild Rank: Layman
    Ambassador to Hartfelden: 11 October -
    Present,
    Thane of Roleplay, December 2018 - Present.
    Syraj
    • Posts: 363
    • Karma: 122
    • I am totally not sleazy. My products are top quality.
    • Former Citizen
    • Familial House
      Kaizer
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
     
    Pages: [1] 2