Sorting Out the StortingA Recap of Recent Wintrean Legislative Eventsby Katie & taulover
Hello friends and allies! I, taulover, am back once more, to discuss our most recent Storting term!
In the August Underhusen election, six candidates stood for election (vying for the default five seats, as no seating legislation had been passed):
- Chanku, the incumbent Speaker pro tempore, ran on a platform of reforming the legal codes, such as introducing an explicit supremacy clause to the Fundamental Laws.
- North ran with the aim of combating inactivity in the Underhusen.
- Evanlicious, a newcomer to the region, ran with the desire to help others in the region.
- Syraj, another relative newcomer, ran on the platform of trying to make the laws more accessible to the citizenry.
- Katie, also somewhat new to the region but having already become quite involved in the community by this time, ran to get involved in the laws and legal procedure of Wintreath.
- Crushita ran with his usual anti-Underhusen platform (in addition to seeking to help with writing/voting on laws in the meantime).
In the end,
Chanku,
North,
Evanlicious,
Syraj, and
Katie were elected to the Underhusen.
Chanku was voted Speaker, and appointed
Syraj as Speaker pro tempore and
Katie as Officer of Information. After several weeks,
Evanlicious resigned due to being busy in other things in his life, and in a special election,
Crushita stood and won by default.
And now, we have Katie, Officer of Information, here to cover the legislation and events of this past term!
- 07.08.2018 – After the standard scheduled Underhusen elections, Chanku, North, Syraj, Katie, and Evanlicious are elected. Crushita did not win, sadly, but their efforts were much appreciated. Notably, Katie was included on all 13 votes cast, the most of any candidate.
- 11.8.2018 – Chanku is elected as the Chair of the Underhusen. He wins 3-2 over North via a tie-breaker vote that he cast himself.
- 13.8.2018 – Speaker Chanku appoints Syraj as Chair Pro Tempore and Katie as Officer of Information. A brief controversy arises regarding the speaker possibly having promised Katie the OoI position, but the Speaker assured those in doubt that he would have chosen someone else had he seen their merit to be greater.
- 23.8.2018 – Speaker Chanku activates Pro Tempore Syraj’s chairing powers due to a Leave of Absence. This lasted from August 23rd at 2:29 AM EST to August 24th at 6:35 PM EST.
- 28.8.2018 – Speaker Chanku declares Evanlicious to be inactive, citing a lack of activity, specifically that he had not posted a single message on the Wintreath forums since the Speaker Elections concluded on August 11th. Attempts were made to contact Evanlicious through NS Telegrams soon afterward.
- 04.9.2018 – Evanlicious resigns as Skrifa, triggering a special election that will take place at a date to be later determined. Ergo he is removed from the inactivity list.
- 13.09.2018 – Crushita wins the Underhusen Special Election by default and fills the position vacated by former Skrifa Evanlicious.
- 07.10.2018 - After a long and productive term, the 29th term officially ends with the election of the 30th Underhusen consisting of Chanku, North, Syraj, Katie, and Laurentus. Long-time Skrifa Crushita loses yet again, and the respectable Pengu comes in last place.
notes
- adds a 13th article to the Fundamental Laws.
- corrects a wording issue in Section 11(b) of the Procedural Rules of the Underhusen.
- adds a 4th section to what is presumably the Underhusen Styles and Honours Act.
- reintroduces a bill tabled during the 28th Storting.
- closes a possible loophole in Speaker Election procedures.
- modifies and adds a 6th section to the Persona Non Grata Act.
- sets the number of Skrifa for the 30th term Underhusen.
- completely rewrites the Wintreath Criminal Code.
- makes changes to the requirements for maintaining one’s citizenship.
And finally, I’d like to go in-depth into some of the important or controversial events this term.The Fundamental Laws Supremacy Amendment ActThis session saw the reintroduction of
the Fundamental Laws Supremacy Amendment Act, which had been introduced during the Twenty-Eighth session by current Speaker of the Underhusen
Chanku L. Kaizer. It was reintroduced to the floor of the Underhusen on August 11th by Speaker
Chanku. The act seeks to explicitly establish the Fundamental Laws, our constitution, as above any other law or document, to fix a potential loophole in the current system. The current system would technically allow the Storting to legally alter the Fundamental Laws with statutory law, as the Storting has the power to pass laws in all matters, with the supremacy of the Fundamental Laws is only a legal norm and custom.
The amendment itself explicitly declares that a law that conflicts with the Fundamental Laws is invalid. This also extends to decrees and rulings to protect the Fundamental Laws. While this situation would ultimately be fruitless, it would be legally possible to do it which is concerning enough none-the-less. Additionally, it makes it harder for a bad actor, or a group of bad actors, to harm Wintreath.
Upon being reintroduced, the bill provoked some discussion and reactions, with some clarifications being made, and it was quickly moved to a vote. Upon voting on the act, it was almost unanimously passed the Underhusen, with Evanlicious not voting. The act passed the Overhusen with a majority of three, the other two peers (
Aragonn and
Cinciri) abstaining. As such this amendment will now be moved to a vote by the Citizenry during the next election, where it is to be seen if it will be passed or rejected, although there is currently no opposition to this amendment.
The Persona-Non-Grata Amendment ActThe Persona Non Grata Amendment Act was proposed to the floor of the Underhusen on August 20th by Skrifa
Syraj. Its original stated purpose was to give overriding rights to the Monarch and the Storting regarding each other’s PNG declarations, citing a potential misuse of the current system by a “bad Storting” that would necessitate an appeal by the Monarch. Immediately fellow Skrifa were sceptical, but Skrifa
Katie attempted to bring a compromise by making such an appellate process more difficult.
The topic was also highly debated in its thread in the Citizen’s Platform. Thane of Dispatches
taulover expressed, in response to Skrifa Katie’s rebuttal of the Speaker’s arguments, the concern that since the Storting and the Monarchy are separated to the point that they cannot interfere with each other, increasing more checks may increase the amount of interference. “The Overhusen represents the Monarch”, as taulover says, suggesting that any actions by such a “bad Storting” could be overruled by the Monarch’s representatives.
In the end, the act passed the Underhusen with only Speaker Chanku voting against. Skrifa
North originally abstained but switched his vote to “aye”, citing Evanlicious’ inactivity and intent to expedite the passage of the bill. The bill failed the Overhusen with a unanimous “nay” vote. An oft-quoted source for their opposition to the bill was Speaker Chanku’s initial arguments regarding the bill’s pitfalls.
The Speaker Election Amendment ActThe Speaker Election Amendment Act was presented to the floor of the Underhusen on August 20th by Skrifa
North. It was intended (at least from what can be ascertained) to address the issue of tiebreaking in Underhusen Speaker elections by introducing 3 tie-breaking ballots and allowing the Monarch a tie-break vote in the event of the failure of the extra ballots.
Quite quickly, many questions arose from fellow Skrifa. Skrifa
Katie was concerned that the wording of the bill implied that there were already multiple ballots, and Speaker
Chanku cited a clause of the Fundamental Laws that states the Underhusen must elect a member of their own.
Intense debate lasted for more than 48 hours before Skrifa
North motioned to table the resolution. The motion passed with the seconds of Katie and Syraj. It is unknown at what future date the Underhusen may return to this legislation and what solutions they may come up with.
The Criminal CodeThe Criminal Code was the piece de resistance of Speaker Chanku, the magnum opus if you will. Its intention was to completely rewrite the criminal laws of Wintreath and institute a system that, according to the Speaker, made more sense and was simpler to navigate.
To quote the Speaker: “The main changes are the renaming of the three categories to Misdemeanors, Felonies, and Capital Crimes. Felonies have been split into three categories, called Classes, each one being more severe than the last. Certain Statutes have been extended, with others lowered. I have also criminalized a few new crimes, and reworded existing crimes.”
There were several concerns raised, both within the Discord chat and on the thread itself, ranging from the definition of “aggression” to the scope of the punishments for conspiracy. Sadly, the Speaker did not respond to many of these concerns and… as per the Procedural Rules, a motion was required to be made after 5 days, which in this case was to table the law. This law may very well make an appearance again in following sessions, so be sure to keep an eye out.
@Katie does this look okay to you?