View Topic

Is there a reason as to why the IC thread is locked?

No idea why it was!  :O

Somebody must have accidentally locked it while navigating on their phone...

Is there a reason as to why the IC thread is locked?

No idea why it was!  :O

I've accidentally locked Empowered threads many more times than I care to admit. It doesn't help that the "Lock Topic" link is wedged quietly and neatly between the page number links and the Quick Reply field.

Just to clarify, the emotes in my IC posts are the faces Perry is making.

Also, PAAR-85 is the single unit designation, as in he is the 85th PAAR, not the series number.

@BraveSirRobin, would the captain be on the bridge now?

Also, I'm a bit uncomfortable with Cinciri saying Yaim Rusur helped the United Gralend Corporation. That's the backstory of my character. While I admit that it makes sense I am uncomfortable with additions to my backstory without so much as consulting me first. Not mad, I'm just a bit uncomfortable with that prospect.

I would be too.

@Tupperman will try to respond to you tomorrow just fyi

Also, I'm a bit uncomfortable with Cinciri saying Yaim Rusur helped the United Gralend Corporation. That's the backstory of my character. While I admit that it makes sense I am uncomfortable with additions to my backstory without so much as consulting me first. Not mad, I'm just a bit uncomfortable with that prospect.

I wasn't referring to the character you were playing or that project in general. I simply meant perhaps the first prototypes. and I mean like just combat data, not meaning they definitely used such information, but rather as suggestions for them to make their own. I was not implying anything about your character in specific. If you would like me to retract that statement I will immediately however, and I apologize if I overstepped

No, I dont want you to retract that part, its fine, just next time please ask me first.

Just to clarify, the emotes in my IC posts are the faces Perry is making.

Also, PAAR-85 is the single unit designation, as in he is the 85th PAAR, not the series number.

@BraveSirRobin, would the captain be on the bridge now?

Indeed the captain may be found on the bridge! 

Just to clarify, the emotes in my IC posts are the faces Perry is making.

Also, PAAR-85 is the single unit designation, as in he is the 85th PAAR, not the series number.

@BraveSirRobin, would the captain be on the bridge now?

Indeed the captain may be found on the bridge! 

Cool, I have a post up. Does the Captain know about Perry's true function?

Just to clarify, the emotes in my IC posts are the faces Perry is making.

Also, PAAR-85 is the single unit designation, as in he is the 85th PAAR, not the series number.

@BraveSirRobin, would the captain be on the bridge now?

Indeed the captain may be found on the bridge! 

Cool, I have a post up. Does the Captain know about Perry's true function?

Considering that the ship's library computer is partially sentient, I'd assume it's at least a possibility.  Certainly someone in engineering who works with the computer system knows

No, I dont want you to retract that part, its fine, just next time please ask me first.

Understood, once again I apologize

Just to clarify, the emotes in my IC posts are the faces Perry is making.

Also, PAAR-85 is the single unit designation, as in he is the 85th PAAR, not the series number.

@BraveSirRobin, would the captain be on the bridge now?

Indeed the captain may be found on the bridge! 

Cool, I have a post up. Does the Captain know about Perry's true function?

Considering that the ship's library computer is partially sentient, I'd assume it's at least a possibility.  Certainly someone in engineering who works with the computer system knows

Or the UGC could have told the Wintreans. I'll leave it up to you.

Or the UGC could have told the Wintreans. I'll leave it up to you.

Oh I was referring to unintentional data transfer when he attempted to access the computer mainframe.  But that works too.  We can go with that.