View Topic

So. Let's at least pretend that I'm campaigning. I am too inactive to be very involved with the legislature, and honestly, if I get in, it will pretty much signify everything that's wrong with the UH, and play right into my agenda of wanting to destroy the Underhusen. So if that doesn't interest you, don't vote for me. There are some other semi-serious candidates who would be more than happy to fill our completely-useless-but-sometimes-necessary chamber of the legislature.

That said, I'm not opposed to questions. And let's get this out of the way first: yes, I am a new convert to His Holiness, the Great Spud. I tried to fight it, but I have seen the error of my ways.

Welcome to the campaign.

It's interesting that you say that you're so inactive, but based on the sneak-peak I took of the community stats so far this month, you're actually still in the top ten most active so far...does that change your opinion of your inactivity?

Shit. It does.

Alright, based on that, I'm revisiting my stance. Vote for me, since the monarch himself just said I'm still one of the most active. It just shows how much our activity has fallen that I can still be in the top 10.

We'll know all is lost when you're no longer among the most active of our members.

In regards to the Constitutional Convention, how many more Underhusen sessions do you foresee are required before we can finally end it once and for all, with a solution satisfactory to the majority of the region?

I can't answer that with any certainty, but at this point, I think gradual changes might be more realistic. The fact that so few people comment on each proposal means people will always be hesitant to take it through the entire process again, for fear of repeating the OA mess.