View Topic

I don't enjoy having the feeling of being influenced by reverse psychology. Vote: VidiLune

DEAD

They're the Brotherhood of Darkness. Why are they taking Darth titles??

DEAD

Also can we get a Dead PM now that we have 3 dead?

They've modernised a bit. They're not exactly the same as the ancient Dark Brotherhood.

And I believe I did create a dead PM

I don't enjoy having the feeling of being influenced by reverse psychology. Vote: VidiLune

I'm going to go with Sapph on this and vote VidiLune.  We also know that Sapph and Ev aren't Sith, if they voted for Wuffu, especially because RE-0N was the only reason why a Sith was killed, so we can rule out any Sith voting for another Sith to conceal their role. 

I like this reasoning, but I need further information to influence my vote than "screw her reverse psychology". Also, those votes happened before RE-0N went boom, so it stands that those votes could have been made to make them look innocent. Now that a good bit of Sith are down, they'll be much more careful if they want to stay alive.

Oh wow, good job picking that one out Sapph. My personal opinion only put Wuufu barely above baseline chances, but when you're right you're right..

As for VidiLune..

1. She's CH-4NK0. In this case, we should kill her ASAP.
2. She's a Sith, in this case, we should kill her ASAP.
3. She's a normal Player and trying to get us to vote for her, it's sad to kill a player but if I'm going to accidentally kill a player I'd rather it be one who tried to implicate themselves.
4. She's a protocol droid. A suicidal one. Oh dear.
5. She's a Jedi, but not a very wise one. I hope she's not a Jedi. I don't find it likely.

Vote: VidiLune

In summation, I don't really see any good reason NOT to kill her. If a more suspicious target presents themselves, I'll switch.

I think she might be CH-4NK0 trying to lure us into killing her so she can self-destruct one of us. It's still a good idea to kill her based on that, however, because if we all go against her, it mitigates the risk of a specific person being killed (because the population of random kill possibilities increases). I'll proceed to vote for VidiLune.

I think she might be CH-4NK0 trying to lure us into killing her so she can self-destruct one of us. It's still a good idea to kill her based on that, however, because if we all go against her, it mitigates the risk of a specific person being killed (because the population of random kill possibilities increases).

Additionally, every second night (tonight) CH-4NK0 gets to make a kill of their own volition. If they are playing optimally, these kills will include more Players than Sith. So we should remove CH-4NK0 as soon as possibly in order to negate their ability to kill going forward.

While I am suspicious of VidiLune's suicidal attitude, I'm going to take myself back to my original stance, because to me, something here doesn't line up. Chanku's vote made it seem that something suddenly influenced/told him to join the bandwagon. Wuufu, to me, doesn't seem like that person, considering how late his vote was. It was most likely neither of them who had this command, so I'm looking for someone who either voted for me before both of them, or someone who voted close to when Chanku did, considering this third force had to be on at the time to command their Sith to vote for me. So, this with leave me with Barnes, North, Aragonn, and Commander_Zemas. Here is how I see each person:

- Aragonn - Possibly trying to start a bandwagon, vote against abstaining
- North - Possibly jumping on the bandwagon, but since he jumped off, we could conclude this was a payback vote
- Barnes - Jumps on the bandwagon, attempts to continue the bandwagon, even after finding one of my voters a sith
- Commander_Zemas - Jumps on the bandwagon, says will change if anyone seems more suspicious, next phase does not vote again.

So, using my logic, the two most suspicious of them would be Aragonn and Barnes. So, this could mean 4 things:

-Aragonn is sith, Barnes is just convinced I'm a baddie
-Barnes is a sith, and is just using Aragonn's original bandwagon as a way to get a free kill
-Both are sith, which would mean Aragonn commanded them to do this, and Barnes never got over the fact that their bandwagon didn't work, so he stayed on.
-Both are innocent, Aragonn just happened to start a bandwagon since I originally abstained, and Barnes is convinced I'm a baddie

I believe that the first possibility is least likely, given the circumstances. So, I think the story that I believe most is the second one, giving my vote onto:

Barnes

If I was leading the Sith, very bad things would be happening as we're systematically knocking off players. I'm not going to give away my methods of determining the order of assassinations, but just know that the Jedi would not be winning.

As for my vote, I wanna work along with Ras, but I don't want to make it look like we're power roles teamed up together. I have some tough choices to make...

Dang it, looks like I missed yesterday's vote. And Aragonn - are the Sith winning? By my count, we've already knocked out two, and that's a good number for this early in the game..

Personally, I will have to agree with Rasdanation's logic, especially since I found Barnes to be suspicious a few days ago myself.

I don't like Barnes' comment about free kills in the day phase - we're much more likely to lynch a good guy than a sith, and any information we get from the former will be minimal at best. Wuufu strikes me as highly suspicious as well given his timing on the vote on Rasdanation.

I'm going to change my vote to Barnes. Her comments are the most suspicious to me.

So today, I will also be voting Barnes.
Vote Barnes

Aragonn - are the Sith winning?

No, they're not winning right now, and therein lies my point. I'm not leading the Sith.

Aragonn - are the Sith winning?

No, they're not winning right now, and therein lies my point. I'm not leading the Sith.

So basically your defense is that you can't be leading the sith because your so good at leading the sith you'd be in Courasant by now.

Ok, Darth Donald.