View Topic

Rasdanation: by 'peer pressure', I meant simply that you had the most votes for you at the time I read through the thread. I wasn't really pressured other than the fact you have to vote to stay alive!

Vote: No Lynch

I agree we should hold up until we have more info.

Vote: Wuufu

@Sapphiron, why ?

Wuufu voted for Rasdanation according to general consensus, which if not explained properly is but a mere unjustified bandwagon. With a few already stacking on Rasdanation at that time, what better way to ensure his lynch or appear to be wrongly influenced by the ones already aboard the wagon?

While I didn't consider this before voting for him, just right before you posted, Wuufu said "you have to vote to stay alive", which I presume is referring to the inactivity rule. He could have posted 'Vote: No Lynch" or anyone else (eg. those who have 0 votes on them since it would not affect the final results). Plus, I just don't see the purpose of not lynching anyone in the day phase after Day 1, when there is near to zero information, unless an indisputable blunder occurred.

Ras, is there anyone you aren't incredibly suspicious of?

Surprisingly, yes. I'm not suspicious of HannahB, after her thorough evidence on how Chanku is a baddie. I'm not that suspicious of North, seeing as the only reason he voted for me was to get back at me since I randomly voted him up... and there are more people but it would take forever. But the thing is, I don't see suspicion as whether you have it or not, I more of see it as everyone has suspicion on others, just some not as much on others. So technically, I do have suspicion on everyone, just some I barely suspect while I highly suspect others.

Rasdanation: by 'peer pressure', I meant simply that you had the most votes for you at the time I read through the thread. I wasn't really pressured other than the fact you have to vote to stay alive!

Vote: No Lynch

I agree we should hold up until we have more info.

What still confuses me here is that, what made you jump on the bandwagon instead of voting for someone random?

Anyways, I'll Abstain for now until I find more information.

Me suspicious?! I don't see why you would say that! :p Just kidding, I do like being lynched just for the hell of it!

Come on people I know that sound suspicious, band-wagon the shit out of me!

Sorry more rude words than normal! *bow low on the floor to show how much she's sorry*

CH-4NK0
should it ever get killed during the night or day phases, it can randomly kill one person who attempted to kill it at night

Me suspicious?! I don't see why you would say that! :p Just kidding, I do like being lynched just for the hell of it!

Come on people I know that sound suspicious, band-wagon the shit out of me!

Sorry more rude words than normal! *bow low on the floor to show how much she's sorry*

Something seems suspicious here...

Innocent local, vindictive RE-0N or reverse psychology?

Innocent local, vindictive RE-0N or reverse psychology?

Maybe... but I've seen how desperate jesters (who win if they get lynched) can sometimes be in ToS

At the same time, as Sapph pointed out, she definitely could be using reverse psychology on us...

*Eats biltong*

This is excellent.

I'd expect CH-4NK0 to be acting VERY conservatively right now. RE-0N as well. They have nothing to gain from being lynched and everything to lose. When they die, we should hope that the Sith do it for us. =)

I'm with Sapphiron in terms of not voting No Lynch. Every successful No Lynch vote diminishes the killing power of the voting public as compared to the Sith's. It destroys our democracy!

To my vote.. Not only is bandwagoning a suspicious behavior, it is also undesirable - even in someone without a power role. We should always have a reason for our votes.

Vote: Wuufu

I invite you to defend yourself.. :p

I'd expect CH-4NK0 to be acting VERY conservatively right now. RE-0N as well. They have nothing to gain from being lynched and everything to lose. When they die, we should hope that the Sith do it for us. =)

I'm with Sapphiron in terms of not voting No Lynch. Every successful No Lynch vote diminishes the killing power of the voting public as compared to the Sith's. It destroys our democracy!

To my vote.. Not only is bandwagoning a suspicious behavior, it is also undesirable - even in someone without a power role. We should always have a reason for our votes.

Vote: Wuufu

I invite you to defend yourself.. :p

@Wuufu ? 

I'd expect CH-4NK0 to be acting VERY conservatively right now. RE-0N as well. They have nothing to gain from being lynched and everything to lose. When they die, we should hope that the Sith do it for us. =)

How about we instead hope that our Seer doesn't die at all? That would be better still.

Vote: Evelynx, for using wording that implies the Seer's death is inevitable, along with a smiley face at the end. Who but a Sith would be smiling about the death of the Seer?