View Topic

Well, whichever comes first. Be inactive for 3 total day phases (by not voting), and you get lynched. Be inactive for two consecutive day phases (by not voting), and you also get lynched.

We can't just not lynch someone, though, because all that entails is that the Sith are going to keep picking us off nightly without having made any progress attempting to catch them on their end.

With that in mind, my vote goes to aternox due to their late "good luck everybody!" post when everyone else had already started voting. At that point the luck-wishing becomes less a collective one and instead a "good luck... because you'll need it before I kill you".

I agree that no vote mean we don't make a lot of progress, and even if no one get's lynched, voting for other people means there is at least a voting record we can look back on later.

 My 'good luck' was just the first time I saw the thread, but I don't think Barnes is suspect for voting due to it purely because there are so few reasons to vote for anyone at this stage of the game.

I am going to Vote: Lynch DekuNut for his post here:

This wagon on no one is gaining steam fast. It must mean the werewolves are leading it. Noone confirmed town?

This could have been an attempt to direct people's attention to people voting 'no lynch' while being able to play the suggestion off as a joke. I don't really have anything else to go on so it will have to do.

Well, time to make an actual vote, because I'd rather not loose a precious abstain. Just because this person hasn't spoken all game, let's see if I can get their attention:
Lynch: @El Fiji Grande

Also, going along with that, @Govindia @Wuufu @Gibraltarica @Kuramia
Remember, you are in this game!

I'm going to vote no lynch, because I think that's the most appropriate move on a Friday at night during the spring when there are more than 15 players left in the game on the first turn when at least several are from other regions.

I think we should respect the individual game we are dealing with and call our enemies what they are - they aren't wolves.. They are SITH! Of the tradition of Darth Vader and Emperor Palpatine and all of the Great Lords before them.. not moon-attuned semi-canine murderers from a backwater planet in far far in the future in a galaxy far far away.

I say we call them the Sith! Not wolves. Is the point.

I think we should respect the individual game we are dealing with and call our enemies what they are - they aren't wolves.. They are SITH! Of the tradition of Darth Vader and Emperor Palpatine and all of the Great Lords before them.. not moon-attuned semi-canine murderers from a backwater planet in far far in the future in a galaxy far far away.

I say we call them the Sith! Not wolves. Is the point.

But what if one of them is of a wolf-hybrid race?  That's pretty rude to completely dismiss that.    WHAT IF ONE IS DARTH WOLF?

I think we should respect the individual game we are dealing with and call our enemies what they are - they aren't wolves.. They are SITH! Of the tradition of Darth Vader and Emperor Palpatine and all of the Great Lords before them.. not moon-attuned semi-canine murderers from a backwater planet in far far in the future in a galaxy far far away.

I say we call them the Sith! Not wolves. Is the point.

They're the Brotherhood of Darkness though. Darth Bane would probably disagree and argue that they're inferior to wolves.

How about we just give them a demeaning nickname and call it good?

The Dark Lords of the Sith.. anyway.. just looking over the rules..
Looks like the Sith can kill one person a night, and CH-4NK0 can kill a person every other night plus if someone kills him they'll auto-retaliate..
If RE-ON dies, they will auto-retaliate against a random player.

Lots of weird possibilities here. These auto-retaliating droids are kind of a big deal.. they could decide the game randomly, if they make it long enough. That'd be somewhat anti-climactic.. =p

For Laurentus:

How can CH-4NK0 win? Since CH-4NK0 is not counted towards the non-Sith count, then the game will always end with a Sith victory before all the non-Sith are dead. Just trying to iron this out a little bit so we know what kind of objectives our enemies may have..

I'm probably just misunderstanding, could I get a hypothetical maybe?

Well, he doesn't count toward the Sith either. It will be difficult for it to win, since it can only kill every second night, and it has to get to the point where there is just one other player and it remaining.

This can happen in many ways. If one goodie, one Sith and it are alive, and it manages to kill either one that night phase, it wins. If the same scenario presents itself during the day, and one of the other two get voted off, it wins as well.

I designed it to have a very difficult up-hill battle, but it has definite advantages that the other players lack. I can't say anymore than that, since that might give people an idea of what strategy to adopt.

So I suppose maybe this passage could be clarified:

"Should they ever become equal in number to everyone else (excepting CH-4NK0), they will win the game. "

Does that mean that as long a CH-4NK0 lives, the game cannot end?

I ask because the alternative interpretation that I have, that CH-4NK0 was not counted towards the non-sith count, would mean that the Sith win in the 1-normal 1-sith 1-CH-4NK0 scenario.

Ah, I should try and think of a way to make that more clear. I meant only that CH-4NK0 is stronger than any individual Sith, so if it comes down to a 1:1:1 (Sith:Normal:CH-4NK0) scenario, the Sith can't win outright, but if it's 2:1:1, then the Sith win the game.

So.. the only win scenarios for CH-4NK0 are 1:1:1 or 0:1:1. So they'll be trying to steadily over time reduce sith numbers at a similar rate to the good guys (proportionally - 3 dead good guys per 1 dead bad), prioritizing the Jedi. They won't necessarily have a clear voting pattern at all.. hm.

A crafty creature, this one will be. Trust in the force, we must.