View Topic

DEAD

Hey @Pengu you forgot to tell everyone that my role was Friend.

The post has been edited.

Also, before I forget:

@HannahB
@Rasdanation
@Commander_Zemas
@xXTheHydraXx

You did not vote last Chapter, so please remember to do so this chapter, or else face Inactivity removal. 

Well.. shit.. =/

Fare thee well friend, Psychos got their first kill.
We'd be able to tell if the Wendigo did it right, @Pengu? Last time there was a conspicuous ripping in half-ness.

 

DEAD

I hope you're able to track down the psychos without me. Farewell, Friends. It was fun.

I'll probably see you in Valhalla soon. Go well, brother. You will be avenged.

Okay, so the reason for this kill seems obvious: Aragonn was the first person to propose Hannah/Evelynx after the Crushita lynch. The question, of course, is whether this was a direct act of retribution or if someone is trying to draw further suspicion onto them.

It's also possible that someone's trying to draw suspicion onto Colberius, as Aragonn voiced suspicions against him (or that Colberius acted directly).

Also @Pengu do we know whether Aragonn was killed by the Wendigo or the psychos?

Well.. shit.. =/

Fare thee well friend, Psychos got their first kill.
We'd be able to tell if the Wendigo did it right, @Pengu? Last time there was a conspicuous ripping in half-ness.

 

Yes and no.

The characters may be used in the story (not by name), but the kills themselves may or may not reflect entirely the person who chose them.

For instance, this particular kill has a few possibilities:

1) The psychos and Wendigo targeted the same person.
2) At least one target was defended.
3) One kill was purposely not sent in.
4) One of the two teams didn't submit a kill (Keep in mind, I didn't implicate either team in this kill).

So while some have been intentional (the two blatant Wendigo kills, North's murder), others have been left up to question (this kill, Sarah's kill, etc...)

But as far as who committed this one goes...that'll be a mystery until the very end.  It could have been the psychos, it could have been a setup by the Wendigo, or it could have been them working together.  That's up to you to guess.

Okay, so the reason for this kill seems obvious: Aragonn was the first person to propose Hannah/Evelynx after the Crushita lynch. The question, of course, is whether this was a direct act of retribution or if someone is trying to draw further suspicion onto them.

It's also possible that someone's trying to draw suspicion onto Colberius, as Aragonn voiced suspicions against him (or that Colberius acted directly).

I'd agree that this was an attempt by the Psychopaths to further implicate Hannah and myself by selecting someone who openly suspected us both. If I was a Psychopath, I would likely try to kill someone who didn't suspect me in preference to someone who did, to make my identity less obvious. If I did choose to take someone out that openly suspected me, I'd likely take out one of those who was more vocal.. not one of the near bystanders who barely uttered a few sentences.

In summation, if I was a psychopath I do not think I would have targeted Aragonn.

Of course, if I'm a Psychopath, my spoken predictions about what the Psychopaths might do should probably be taken with a grain of salt. We should all draw our own conclusions based on the data we have.

Since I've already gone over my reasoning...

Vote: HannahB

I still think she's the most suspicious person, and I see no reason not to pursue the most promising lead that we have. If she turns out to be a psychopath, then it seems almost certain that Evey is too...between also being involved in the events that led to North being lynched and her constant defense of Hannah. If not...well, we'll have to start over from scratch and re-evaluate.

Agreed on that much.

Vote: Lynch HannahB

Since I've already gone over my reasoning...

Vote: HannahB (removed boldedness to not confuse pengu..)

I still think she's the most suspicious person, and I see no reason not to pursue the most promising lead that we have. If she turns out to be a psychopath, then it seems almost certain that Evey is too...between also being involved in the events that led to North being lynched and her constant defense of Hannah. If not...well, we'll have to start over from scratch and re-evaluate.

I do not think this is the only lead we had. The conversation was quite gracefully led away from the fact, but we had a lead that led to both Crushita and Broddring_Empire and have had for some time. Namely their first day pile on VidiLune to save Crushita.

Is it any less suspicious that Crushita was saved by the VidiLune pile now than it was then, now that we know that at least 2 of those in the pile were psychopaths? I'd say not, but that's just me. For reference, the mini-pile that saved Crushita:

Code: [Select]

Crushita Telcontar
2016-02-11 13:45:03
[member=1340]VidiLune[/member]

North
2016-02-11 15:10:10
[member=1340]VidiLune[/member]

Commander_Zemas
2016-02-11 15:16:07
[member=1340]VidiLune[/member]

Broddring Empire
2016-02-11 15:28:12
[member=1340]VidiLune[/member]

BraveSirRobin
2016-02-11 15:54:53
[member=1340]VidiLune[/member]
I have confined my voting to those in this list since I made it because I still think it's suspicious. 4/5 of these are now dead, 2 of which were psychopaths, an accuracy rate of 50%. I believe, since we started with around 20 players, that this is WELL above pure chance. Crushita's psychopathy only lends further credence to the list, in my opinion, to the extent that it has any predictive power whatsoever.

Therefore, I will continue to confine my voting to this list.
Vote: Commander_Zemas

In summation, if I was a psychopath I do not think I would have targeted Aragonn.

Yeah, but what about reverse reverse psychology?

In order to help stack a vote for one suspect instead of two, I will being voting HannahB (at least for the time being).

In summation, if I was a psychopath I do not think I would have targeted Aragonn.

Yeah, but what about reverse reverse psychology?

In order to help stack a vote for one suspect instead of two, I will being voting HannahB (at least for the time being).

Of course, any proposition can be nullified that way. I don't think it would have been a good move, reverse psychology doesn't actually work that well.

I'm just noting it as a possibility. You never know what level others are playing at.