View Topic

That is the first good luck we've had. It seems the Wendigo faces the same problem as Sir Galahad did in Ye Olde Arthurian Legend, namely that anyone they target could be one of their allies. With luck, they'll kill one of the psychos again in the next night phase.

Anyway, Broddring Empire didn't even register on my radar of suspects. What was his voting pattern?

Broddring Empire was in my list of suspects, due to the frequency analysis that I performed day 2.

Also in the list were North, BraveSirRobin, and Commander_Zemas. Possibly Crushita.

I should re-run those numbers.

Looking at Broddring's profile, he was active five hours ago, so the first possibility I listed didn't happen. @Pengu, would it count toward inactivity if the wolves didn't target anyone on purpose, in the same way it would count as inactivity if we chose to abstain from voting?

I'm also assuming that the wolves aren't facing problems with the messaging system as in Werewolf 3?

Literally the only thing Broddring Empire said the entire time was his vote in the first round.

Hi everyone! Exciting to be here. It is unfortunate that we have to chose someone now but having read through the thread, and the analyses Gerrick made, I vote Vidilune. I'm sorry but someone has to go first :/

We should probably be more suspicious of those who hardly post.

Looking at Broddring's profile, he was active five hours ago, so the first possibility I listed didn't happen. @Pengu, would it count toward inactivity if the wolves didn't target anyone on purpose, in the same way it would count as inactivity if we chose to abstain from voting?

I'm also assuming that the wolves aren't facing problems with the messaging system as in Werewolf 3?

No, if you remember this:

Tip #5: Wolves don't always have to claim a victim
This may sound completely absurd that the wolves would choose not to kill anyone, but it can be a good strategic move.  It will make players think that you may be inactive, but more than likely they'll believe that the defenders were doing their job well.  Likewise, it will make the defenders believe that you attacked their intended target, so they'll most likely decide to try to defend said target again.

Unless games have a more lenient inactivity rule (IE, if you post during the night you're still alive), inactivity is kept strictly to voting.  If a power role does not use their power but votes during the day, they're allowed to do that.

That's if the move was on purpose, though.  And that's something you won't know until the nightly synopsis post-game.

As far as the messaging system goes, I try to make sure that everyone understands the system well enough to not have any issues, which it thankfully wasn't during the last game, so I think people are understanding how to do it a bit better.

Yeah, perhaps you're right. We've been tearing each other apart, and in Broddring's case at least, he could just sit back and watch.

So. Who's going to go back and look for quiet people in this monstrosity of a thread?

And since you got back to me while I was typing, thanks Pengu.

So. Who's going to go back and look for quiet people in this monstrosity of a thread?

Yeah... I'll do it, but others can if they want in case I miss something. I'll probably end up making a spreadsheet with the number of posts each person made before this past night phase.

*The player could also have negated all baddie attacks on the good guys, sorry*

Well, except that the wendigo did kill last time...

Wait, what? The wendigo has killed someone other than Broddring? When did this happen?

Or am I misunderstanding? Or are you misunderstanding?

In case that is the case, note that the player stopping baddies from killing good guys would obviously not prevent the Wendigo from killing a psycho.

Unless he's referring to Eva's (VidiLune's) murder where she was decapitated, which has absolutely nothing to do with the night phase and thus actions of the Wendigo player.

...
...

Yup, I'm confused now.
...
...

I am actually more suspicious of Laurentus than anyone else. Just a gut feeling. Don't everyone bandwagon because of it.

0.o

You, Aragonn, the analytical being you are, are suspicious of me based on a gut feeling?

We should probably be more suspicious of those who hardly post.

Yeah, perhaps you're right. We've been tearing each other apart, and in Broddring's case at least, he could just sit back and watch.

So. Who's going to go back and look for quiet people in this monstrosity of a thread?

I'll be the first to admit that I am one of those quiet people this game. Or, more accurately, was one of those quiet people.

0.o

You, Aragonn, the analytical being you are, are suspicious of me based on a gut feeling?

Being analytical with data can still arouse emotional suspicion...