Pages: [1]

Question on Underhusen's Veto Override Authority
Posts: 15 Views: 1424

Sapphiron
  • Regional Stability Squad
  • Scarlet Petal Floats
  • Below is Article I, Section 9 of the Fundamental Laws of Wintreath
    Quote
    Should the Overhusen veto any legislation, the legislation may be reintroduced in the Underhusen for the purposes of either revising the proposal or overriding the veto. The Underhusen may overturn a veto by a two-thirds supermajority vote.
    Below is Section 2.3 of the Citizenship and Demonym Act
    Quote
    The Storting shall have the authority to revoke Citizenship from any person with a majority vote of both chambers, so long as the legislation revoking the Citizenship contains the reasons for doing so. Persons whose Citizenship has been revoked by the Storting may appeal the decision to the Monarch, who can restore Citizenship by decree.

    Correct me if I am wrong, but I do believe that the Fundamental Laws of Wintreath takes priority over any statutory laws. Just to name an example, in the event of a citizenship revocation, should it be supported by the entirety of the Underhusen (or at least 2/3 of it), even if it is vetoed by the Overhusen, can it still be brought back and enacted by overriding the veto?

    Well, I do acknowledge that there are no past instances of the Underhusen overriding a veto from the Overhusen. However, if I may, I would like to enquire about the constitutionality of any laws involving clauses that seek the approval from both chambers, the Underhusen and the Overhusen.
    Sapphiron
    • Scarlet Petal Floats
    • Posts: 5,238
    • Karma: 807
    • Audi alteram partem
    • Regional Stability Squad
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Familial House
      Valeria
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Reon
  • Former Citizen
  • For reference... That section... Section 2.3 is already known to be flawed... "With a majority vote of both chambers" has been in debate before as to whether it means that we have to vote together or if a separate vote is still appropriate or even legal... The intent of the law was separate vote but the law by writing reads a together vote, at least by my eye... And it's come up before...
    Basically... We wrote our laws like really badly... All of the early ones are just... Terrible... Just... Awful... We've been.. Better? As of late however when you stand on a flawed base and you write everything off that base your things are bound to be flawed...
    Face the facts of being what you are, for that is what changes what you are.
    Reon
    • Posts: 2,089
    • Karma: 254
    • Follow the Truth, whoever that may be.
    • Former Citizen
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Sapphiron
  • Regional Stability Squad
  • Scarlet Petal Floats
  • I see, but if we were to stick to the original intent of Section 2.3 of the Citizenship and Demonym Act. with the votes being tallied separately, can the Underhusen legally revoke the citizenship of a Wintrean by itself?
    Sapphiron
    • Scarlet Petal Floats
    • Posts: 5,238
    • Karma: 807
    • Audi alteram partem
    • Regional Stability Squad
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Familial House
      Valeria
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Wintermoot
  • Regional Stability Squad
  • The Greyscale Magi-Monk
  • This is why we have an amendment process, to fix problems, ambiguities, and conflicts that come up over time. :P

    For the record, I hope that any solution preserves what I consider to be the secondary principle of our government, that on some major issues there should be consensus among the branches, such as a revocation of Citizenship.


    I went all the way to Cassadega to commune with the dead
    They said "You'd better look alive"
    Wintermoot
    • The Greyscale Magi-Monk
    • Posts: 19,456
    • Karma: 9,679
    • Weather: ❄️
    • Regional Stability Squad
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Orientation
      Demisexual
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Chanku
  • Citizen
  • Yes it can. Fundamental Laws take precedence over Statutory laws when they conflict. Therefore the Underhusen can override a veto by the UH for any law.
    See you later space cowboy.
    Old Signature

     
    Current Positions in Wintreath
    Matriarch of House Kaizer
    Speaker of the 29th Underhusen
    Advisor to the Riksråd
    Positions I've held
    Riksrad(1st Jarl of Information, 3rd Jarl of Foreign Affairs, 2nd Jarl of Defense)
    Member of the WHR
    Speaker of the Underhusen (3rd)
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the Underhusen (1st)
    Underhusen Member (1st-3rd)
    Member of the 5th Overhusen
    Chairman of the 5th Overhusen
    6th Underhusen
    Speaker of the 6th Underhusen
    Mandate Holder for Jarl of Defense
    Member of the 8th Storting (Underhusen)
    Royalty of Wintreath
    Ambassador for the Department of Foreign Affairs.
    Underhusen Terms I've been a part of
    1st Underhusen
    2nd Underhusen
    3rd Underhusen
    6th Underhusen
    8th Underhusen
    Overhusen Terms I've been a part of
    5th Overhusen
    Families I've been a part of
    Kaizer - Matriarch (REFORMED)
    Kestar - Child of Wintermoot (REMOVED)
    Chanku
    Sapphiron
  • Regional Stability Squad
  • Scarlet Petal Floats
  • If that is the case, I would like to once again enquire about the constitutionality of any laws involving clauses that seek the approval from both chambers. Meanwhile, out of pure interest, is the Underhusen willing to relieve its authority to override a veto from the Overhusen?
    Sapphiron
    • Scarlet Petal Floats
    • Posts: 5,238
    • Karma: 807
    • Audi alteram partem
    • Regional Stability Squad
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Familial House
      Valeria
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Chanku
  • Citizen
  • The laws themselves would either be illegal or that section would be. Further the only way the Underhusen can remove it's veto power would be an amendment to the Fundamental Laws. I would not support such an amendment as it exists incase of emergencies.
    See you later space cowboy.
    Old Signature

     
    Current Positions in Wintreath
    Matriarch of House Kaizer
    Speaker of the 29th Underhusen
    Advisor to the Riksråd
    Positions I've held
    Riksrad(1st Jarl of Information, 3rd Jarl of Foreign Affairs, 2nd Jarl of Defense)
    Member of the WHR
    Speaker of the Underhusen (3rd)
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the Underhusen (1st)
    Underhusen Member (1st-3rd)
    Member of the 5th Overhusen
    Chairman of the 5th Overhusen
    6th Underhusen
    Speaker of the 6th Underhusen
    Mandate Holder for Jarl of Defense
    Member of the 8th Storting (Underhusen)
    Royalty of Wintreath
    Ambassador for the Department of Foreign Affairs.
    Underhusen Terms I've been a part of
    1st Underhusen
    2nd Underhusen
    3rd Underhusen
    6th Underhusen
    8th Underhusen
    Overhusen Terms I've been a part of
    5th Overhusen
    Families I've been a part of
    Kaizer - Matriarch (REFORMED)
    Kestar - Child of Wintermoot (REMOVED)
    Chanku
    Reon
  • Former Citizen

  • Yes it can. Fundamental Laws take precedence over Statutory laws when they conflict.
    My memories of the law are, as always and as you well know, hazy... Can you point out the place where this is written?
    Face the facts of being what you are, for that is what changes what you are.
    Reon
    • Posts: 2,089
    • Karma: 254
    • Follow the Truth, whoever that may be.
    • Former Citizen
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Sapphiron
  • Regional Stability Squad
  • Scarlet Petal Floats
  • The laws themselves would either be illegal or that section would be. Further the only way the Underhusen can remove it's veto power would be an amendment to the Fundamental Laws. I would not support such an amendment as it exists incase of emergencies.
    Can someone else verify the above statement regarding any statutory laws involving clauses that seek the approval from both chambers?

    Mainly because if Section 2.3 of the Citizenship and Demonym Act is deemed illegal, the Storting has just lost its power to initiate a citizenship revocation.
    Quote from: For Reference
    The Storting shall have the authority to revoke Citizenship from any person with a majority vote of both chambers, so long as the legislation revoking the Citizenship contains the reasons for doing so. Persons whose Citizenship has been revoked by the Storting may appeal the decision to the Monarch, who can restore Citizenship by decree.
    Sapphiron
    • Scarlet Petal Floats
    • Posts: 5,238
    • Karma: 807
    • Audi alteram partem
    • Regional Stability Squad
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Familial House
      Valeria
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Chanku
  • Citizen
  • technically it could just apply to the offending place, so that phrase would be illegal and be non-applicable.
    See you later space cowboy.
    Old Signature

     
    Current Positions in Wintreath
    Matriarch of House Kaizer
    Speaker of the 29th Underhusen
    Advisor to the Riksråd
    Positions I've held
    Riksrad(1st Jarl of Information, 3rd Jarl of Foreign Affairs, 2nd Jarl of Defense)
    Member of the WHR
    Speaker of the Underhusen (3rd)
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the Underhusen (1st)
    Underhusen Member (1st-3rd)
    Member of the 5th Overhusen
    Chairman of the 5th Overhusen
    6th Underhusen
    Speaker of the 6th Underhusen
    Mandate Holder for Jarl of Defense
    Member of the 8th Storting (Underhusen)
    Royalty of Wintreath
    Ambassador for the Department of Foreign Affairs.
    Underhusen Terms I've been a part of
    1st Underhusen
    2nd Underhusen
    3rd Underhusen
    6th Underhusen
    8th Underhusen
    Overhusen Terms I've been a part of
    5th Overhusen
    Families I've been a part of
    Kaizer - Matriarch (REFORMED)
    Kestar - Child of Wintermoot (REMOVED)
    Chanku
    Sapphiron
  • Regional Stability Squad
  • Scarlet Petal Floats
  • Do you have any existing legislation which supports your claim that the unconstitutionality of a law only affects the offending phrase?
    Sapphiron
    • Scarlet Petal Floats
    • Posts: 5,238
    • Karma: 807
    • Audi alteram partem
    • Regional Stability Squad
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Familial House
      Valeria
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Chanku
  • Citizen
  • Well we honestly have no precedent what-so-ever. I mean if we had a case heard by a court I could at least predict, but in reality it's up in the air at this point.
    See you later space cowboy.
    Old Signature

     
    Current Positions in Wintreath
    Matriarch of House Kaizer
    Speaker of the 29th Underhusen
    Advisor to the Riksråd
    Positions I've held
    Riksrad(1st Jarl of Information, 3rd Jarl of Foreign Affairs, 2nd Jarl of Defense)
    Member of the WHR
    Speaker of the Underhusen (3rd)
    Speaker Pro Tempore of the Underhusen (1st)
    Underhusen Member (1st-3rd)
    Member of the 5th Overhusen
    Chairman of the 5th Overhusen
    6th Underhusen
    Speaker of the 6th Underhusen
    Mandate Holder for Jarl of Defense
    Member of the 8th Storting (Underhusen)
    Royalty of Wintreath
    Ambassador for the Department of Foreign Affairs.
    Underhusen Terms I've been a part of
    1st Underhusen
    2nd Underhusen
    3rd Underhusen
    6th Underhusen
    8th Underhusen
    Overhusen Terms I've been a part of
    5th Overhusen
    Families I've been a part of
    Kaizer - Matriarch (REFORMED)
    Kestar - Child of Wintermoot (REMOVED)
    Chanku
    Sapphiron
  • Regional Stability Squad
  • Scarlet Petal Floats
  • I am not exactly sure how this links to the judiciary. My point is that if Section 2.3 of the Citizenship and Demonym Act is unconstitutional (and therefore illegal), the Storting (legislature) would not have the ability to pass an act revoking the citizenship of a Wintrean.
    Sapphiron
    • Scarlet Petal Floats
    • Posts: 5,238
    • Karma: 807
    • Audi alteram partem
    • Regional Stability Squad
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Familial House
      Valeria
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Reon
  • Former Citizen
  • Sapphiron, I'm gonna be straight with you here... Are laws are awful. Like really terrible... They're largely nonfunctional and the parts that do function we don't know how to use or are too scared to...
    It's impossible for us to answer this question because we literally have no idea.
    Like a law can be turned over if it's unconstitutional and it's sort of implied that laws have no effects if they're unconstitutional but I don't personally remember if it actually directly says that anywhere... Or if it matters... If people want a thing to happen it really just will... Our law exists simply to reinforce itself and as a fun little amendment project to do... It has no actual or functional use...
    2 people like this post: Aaron Specter, Laurentus
    Face the facts of being what you are, for that is what changes what you are.
    Reon
    • Posts: 2,089
    • Karma: 254
    • Follow the Truth, whoever that may be.
    • Former Citizen
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
    Sapphiron
  • Regional Stability Squad
  • Scarlet Petal Floats
  • Alright then ... :P
    Sapphiron
    • Scarlet Petal Floats
    • Posts: 5,238
    • Karma: 807
    • Audi alteram partem
    • Regional Stability Squad
    • Pronouns
      He/Him/His
      Familial House
      Valeria
      Wintreath Nation
      Logged
     
    Pages: [1]