View Topic

I factored them in to my calculation. With them, it would have been 2/9.

Well, Frozen being removed was pretty much random, but Colberius was selected...is there anything about that that might help us?

Not really. I think it would indicate the wolf is someone who's played with him before, but that's pretty much everyone here.

Oh, what the heck. I vote to eject Sapphiron. He's usually a lot more helpful. Though I understand that none of us are exactly very active at the moment, and Sapphiron is possibly still busy with school, it's the closest thing I have to a good plan, though admittedly it's pretty terrible.

I'm also looking at aternox for the same reason, though he hasn't been online much.

If nothing else, my vote will serve to generate debate.

Vote: Eject Laurentus.

Here's an out of context quote:

I kept an eye on Colby specifically

Oh, sure, take no mercy on the guy who lost computer access for a week.  I was hoping I might not have died yet...

I'm glad to see someone considered me a threat, though. 

Anyway...

* Colberius X dies.

Vote: Eject Laurentus.

Here's an out of context quote:

I kept an eye on Colby specifically

Wow. Like. I don't even know how to respond to this. This is hilariously out of character for you, Sapphiron.

You admit to taking an out-of-context quote and then voting for me based on that. You don't even try to hide behind a trick that Aaron Specter used against me previously and using my day one vote for Colby as reason for suspecting me, instead of this sloppy tactic.

Given how perfectly logical you are in pretty much everything, this is incredibly suspicious.

There are a few possibilities:

1) You've just had a spectacular lapse of judgment on a scale I would never would have expected from you.

2) You're a defender who's panicked that I'm voting for you now, and in your panic you've made a very sloppy mistake.

3) You're one of the Koopas, and you'll try just about anything to stay in the game now that I've voted for you, including using some very absurd justification for your vote, as you did when voting for Wintermoot in the previous game at the end.

#1 is very unlikely, since I don't believe you're capable of such poor logic, as you've always demonstrated incredibly precise logic. #2 is also very unlikely, since you were a defender in Werewolf 3, and you and I were continuously in bad positions, and you remained calm and rational when explaining why you and I weren't wolves.

That leaves me with #3.

Pardon me, I was slightly annoyed by something that happened in school so I simply did a retaliatory vote. Despite that, I will claim that I am certainly not a Koopa though.

And any Koopa would do the same.

I'm not convinced, Sapph. I think I'll maintain my vote now. If you end up being innocent, then oops.

EDIT: What were you annoyed by, though? It had to have been something extraordinary for you to do a simple retaliatory vote.

You flatter me. Anyhow, it's the usual problem faced by high school students. Being allocated an unjustified proportion of workload while almost half of the team literally kicking back and relax. It's worse when a team member decides to delay past the deadline because he is busy playing computer games, and when I decide to confront that person, I get into unnecessary arguments. Then, the project manages to fail spectacularly.

~Rant Complete~

I know the feeling. I kicked the crap out of people who didn't contribute to group assignments while in high school, and still expected to come along for the ride and cash in on our hard work. It's one thing for someone to try and contribute, while just not being very knowledgeable or creative, but it is another thing entirely when they literally just don't do anything. It is especially annoying when they have some snarky remarks about how the work isn't being done right too.

But sympathy aside, it is still out of character for you to vote in this way.

This is only a game anyway, so I hope you won't take it personally that I keep my vote on you.

No hard feelings, just sharing whatever has happened to me.

Is anyone else slightly... irked by how little participation we're seeing in this game? It feels increasingly like the Laurentus And Guest Show, and not as if there are 9 active players. I admit I'm part of the problem but hope to be much more active from now on.

Laurentus, why vote Sapphiron, but not Wintermoot or aternox whom you previously mentioned you had suspected?

Sapphiron, I would ask you about that remarkably random post in which you voted Laurentus but he beat me to it. If you had to vote anyone that wasn't Laurentus, who would you vote? And would you accept that your vote is purely retaliatory?

Everyone else's input would also be appreciated; we're running out of time for this phase and I'd like my vote to not be another self-vote or random vote.

Quite simple, really. I only suspect Wintermoot because he survived the night. There are a number of explanations for that.

It can't really be aternox, because he has been very absent.

I admit I didn't have a lot to go on when I first voted for Sapphiron, and I really only did it to generate some sort of debate, but his reaction was exceedingly odd. I still wouldn't say I'm sold on him being the wolf, but I don't see a lot to go on either way.

Time for my old test.

Everyone must give reasons why they could be wolves, and why they could not be wolves. As Aaron Specter well knows, I'm serious when I say non-compliance will be met with raised eyebrows.

@Aaron Specter - I've been asleep and/or otherwise occupied while the Sapph and Laurentus show was going on. I do live on the east coast of the US, ya know.

@Laurentus - One reason for me being a koopa, you'll never know it was me. One reason for me not being a koopa, again, you'll never know. I'm just that good at acting, or as some may call it, roleplaying.

It can't really be aternox, because he has been very absent.

Ah, and absenteeism is the best indicator of innocence?

I admit I didn't have a lot to go on when I first voted for Sapphiron, and I really only did it to generate some sort of debate, but his reaction was exceedingly odd. I still wouldn't say I'm sold on him being the wolf, but I don't see a lot to go on either way.

I'm not sold on it myself but I know too well the stresses of work and how that can have an adverse impact on other areas of life. I'm saving my vote for now since I think a better prospect should come up.

Time for my old test.

Everyone must give reasons why they could be wolves, and why they could not be wolves. As Aaron Specter well knows, I'm serious when I say non-compliance will be met with raised eyebrows.

Heh.

I'm happy to participate but I think it's too early in the game for any meaningful answers to be found. Most people, I anticipate, will say their inactivity will be a reason for their guilt, whereas there won't be much to indicate their innocence. I also fear nowhere near enough people will answer you in this day phase. I'd be glad to hear anything at all from a lot of people this phase.

Still, if you insist, I'll do it, though I ask you to go first.

On a note that is completely unrelated to the game: Is there anyone else called Aaron on these forums? I'm struggling to think why people always take pains to type out my name in full every time they refer to me.