View Topic

OOC: I just have no fucking clue who it could be.

OOC: Wait, Pengu, you said before the first game the spy wasn't allowed to start a vote against someone.

OOC: Ah you're correct, I did make that ruling.  Disregard what I said then. 

And I'd like to jump again and vote that Sapphiron is the spy.

OK, there's now a vote against Sapphiron. Lynching Sapph requires a unanimous vote.

Wait... Then what's stopping us from just going down the line, starting votes, and seeing who can't?

Wait... Then what's stopping us from just going down the line, starting votes, and seeing who can't?

Because it'd be an unfair exploitation of the game rules, and I could just say "You know what, disregard that rule." 

Wait... Then what's stopping us from just going down the line, starting votes, and seeing who can't?

Because it'd be an unfair exploitation of the game rules, and I could just say "You know what, disregard that rule." 

Are you saying that? 

Wait... Then what's stopping us from just going down the line, starting votes, and seeing who can't?

Because it'd be an unfair exploitation of the game rules, and I could just say "You know what, disregard that rule." 

Are you saying that? 

If you try to exploit it, then I will. 

Wait... Then what's stopping us from just going down the line, starting votes, and seeing who can't?

Because it'd be an unfair exploitation of the game rules, and I could just say "You know what, disregard that rule." 

Are you saying that? 

Since there hasn't been a response since 24 hours ago, I'll assume that there's a little disagreement with what I've said (or people just aren't checking the topic ), and I'll explain why I responded that way.

Your method of exploiting that rule by just going down the line and seeing who can't start a vote is a complete game-breaker.  After all...why even bother asking questions at that point if we can just be like "Hey, let's have everyone start a vote, and the person who can't must be the spy!"

It's both an unfair exploitation against the spy, and it damages the integrity of the game if the players choose to resort to such tactics to claim a win.

Which is why I say that if you decide to do such an exploitation of the rules, then I'll simply say "You know what, let's just allow spies to start votes from now on."  Because we want to keep the game fair for everyone.

And for those simply not paying attention to the thread, Sapphiron is the one being voted against.

Sapphiron should be arrested! 

Is that a vote for Sapphiron being the spy, Bootsie?

And to everyone else, please vote.

I'm really not convinced that it's Sapphiron.

I'm really not either but I don't have any clue and I doubt I'm gonna get one if I haven't so far so...
I vote for Sapph.

I'm going to vote no on Sapphiron and start a new vote against Bootsie.

I've found her answers and questions to be generally odd given the context of our location, and she seems way too excited about 'arresting' Sapphiron.