Reon honestly I find your claims ridiculous. Wintreath can exist without Wintermoot, although it will require someone equally as dedicated to Wintreath as him at least at this time. However we must keep in mind that circumstances change. Furthermore I reject the notion that there is no Wintreath without Wintermoot; while I do also acknowledge the fact that he has the power to remove anyone from the forums, he has that ability because he holds both the Administrative and Monarch position. Furthermore it is unknown if he will choose someone to hold the root administrative account that won't be the next monarch, and we can not know until it happens.
Also I find your claims of giving the Monarch the power because Wintermoot has those ability to remove someone is in itself bad logic built on the foundation that because someone holds two legally separate positions the lesser position (in this case the Monarch) should have the power, which in itself is a dangerous line of thinking.
Futhermore your statement that I am even trying to modify it is a parallel that is not comparable to what you are trying to do. My modification is fixing a system that was written badly when passed (although I do blame myself for failing to have suggested fixes at first and catching the fact that it was setup badly, although I do blame that partially on my inexperience at the time). Furthermore your system is unclean as well and is more prone to being bought off than you think.
By giving power to the monarch, whom has already stated he will give it to another individual, there is a single point of error, the Monarch and/or the appointed designee. Even if there is a set procedure it can be amended for any case and thus the designee can create an unfair trial due to personal issues with someone if they so desire. The solution to prevent that would be to setup a procedure by the Storting, but no bill legislating the Executive would ever pass.
Furthermore your design goes against anything that a logical engineer or designer would do. You never design a system to have only one point where it can fail. Doing so will mean that it will break as soon as that single point does. Hell your system itself makes it to where only one person is needed to be bought off. In our current system it requires at least three people, and even then the Monarch can order a retrial or an appeal can occur. Meaning that it can be even more people that one would need to buy off.
Finally I also must respond with the fact that should the system ever become corrupt then it would be unable to be fixed in any capacity, until the Monarch wishes, that is assuming the monarch him/herself does not become corrupt; which is to say wishful thinking at possibly the best which is why the saying "power corrupts" exists, because it does. Do I think that Wintermoot will become corrupt once he gets the power, I do doubt it. However once again another Monarch could easily become corrupt.
Finally the period for debate has passed. However I motion to extend debate for another four days.
Edit: One final point, your statement:
This is in accordance with the steps set out in Denth's post last term.
is in itself, not a valid argument due to the fact that I have always opposed Denth's proposal since he posted it and have always been against it.
