View Topic

Title
1. This shall be titled the Case Selection Procedure Act

Case Selection
2. Upon filing of a case in the Citizen's Platform, the Speaker of the
    Underhusen and the Chairman of the Overhusen shall decide on the
    acceptance of a case. Upon the posting of both positions, should
    they oppose they shall have 48-hours to come to an agreement. If
    neither of them can come to an agreement then the case shall be
    voted upon by both branches.
  2.1 If two members of either branch disagree with the decision by the
       Speaker and the Chairman then, upon public announcement of such
       it shall be voted upon by both branches.
    2.1.1 disagreements must be voiced within a 48-hour period after the
            decision
  2.2 The voting shall be conducted as a normal law, but shall be
       whether or not the case becomes a trial. Should it fail then the
       case shall be denied. Should it pass it shall be accepted.
3. The Storting must consider the case, unless it is withdrawn before
    both the chairman and the speaker have commented on it.
4. No case shall be withdrawn during consideration, or after acceptance

Go ahead and discuss!

I personally think it's poorly written and creates a lot shit that we have to do. I think the case should automatically go to a vote in the UH, then the OH, and if it's passed, the Monarch appoints the Justices and shit happens and yay justice.

I don't really like this... We're removing the justice, though we did delay for the holidays. Why would we put silly amendments in to something we already really don't like... But this has reminded me to get it together on the justice stuff... I'll put up the necessary repeals up within the next week instead of bothering with this...

The 48 hours of debate is up. Do we have a motion?

I motion to vote.

Do we have a second for the motion to vote?

I second the motion to vote.

This bill is now going to a vote.