View Topic

I hope to correct the incorrect and unfair stereotypes of con men... Honestly, it's just disrespectful.

Or you could...you know...describe yourself as something with a positive connotation.

Or you could...you know...describe yourself as something with a positive connotation.

Is it true Wintermoot that he can't serve in both houses?  He seems to think so.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk

Or you could...you know...describe yourself as something with a positive connotation.

Is it true Wintermoot that he can't serve in both houses?  He seems to think so.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk

Or you could...you know...describe yourself as something with a positive connotation.

Is it true Wintermoot that he can't serve in both houses?  He seems to think so.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk

Did you really need to post that three times? O_o

Did you really need to post that three times? O_o

Sorry.  The app was throwing me posting errors so I thought it didn't go through.  My bad :-/.

Would you still please answer the question?  Thanks

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4 via Tapatalk

Moot, better answer him fast, he felt the need to ask it three times

Govindia, you say you work best under strict deadlines, in the Underhusen, there are no such real deadlines except the term ending. How can we be sure you'll effectively introduce and create legislation, and what assurances can you give us voters that your stint in the Underhusen won't fall by the wayside like your nation rp has for so long?

Fiiiinnnnneeeee. ;-;

While there was no intention of allowing someone to serve in both chambers at the same time, there's no provision I'm aware of for an Overhusen member to lose their position if they win an Underhusen seat. I would never appoint anyone to the Overhusen that had won an Overhusen, but it appears vacancy elections like this weren't considered.

I do intend to put in a clause where you can remove a member of the Overhusen your discretion. Or rather that the Monarch can, which you appear to be rather solidly in.

They'll have to pry it from my cold, dead hands...or something.

Fiiiinnnnneeeee. ;-;

While there was no intention of allowing someone to serve in both chambers at the same time, there's no provision I'm aware of for an Overhusen member to lose their position if they win an Underhusen seat. I would never appoint anyone to the Overhusen that had won an Overhusen, but it appears vacancy elections like this weren't considered.

You sounded upset when both CHanku and Reon decided to run while still in the Overhusen though which made it sound like you disapproved.

I was upset that Chanku didn't provide advance notice that he planned on running so I could begin looking for someone to replace him. While it's technically not a requirement, it's a courtesy that everyone else has given in the past. I'm not upset at all that Reon's running...I'm not sure where you got that impression, lol.

Fish?

And I did ask Wintermoot if I could run. He agreed.

Feeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh!