View Topic

Title
1. This shall be titled the Fundamental Laws Amendment VI - Judicial Amendment Act

Amendments
  2. Article III Section 1 shall be amended to read,

Upon the filing and acceptance of Civil and Criminal cases within the Storting, the Monarch shall select at random a Peer of the Overhusen and two Skrifa of the Underhusen to serve as judges. The Skrifa and Overhusen peer shall have no ties to the case, should no suitable Skrifa and/or Overhusen Peers exist, a pool from active citizens that have no ties to the case shall be used. The Peer shall serve as Chief Judge, and the Skrifa shall serve as Associate Judges.

  3. Article III Section 2 shall be amended to read,

2. All trials and cases shall proceed along the procedures established by the Storting. Furthermore what denotes an Active Citizen and ties to a case shall be established by the Storting.

    3.1 Article III Section 2 shall also be renamed to Article III Section
         3 instead.

  4. Article III shall also be amended with Section 2, which shall read

  Upon the filing and acceptance of Cases regarding Wintreath Laws by the Monarch, or a Subordinate Official of the Monarch's, shall select at random, three active Wintreath Citizens, whom have no ties to the case at hand, and choose one to act as a Chief Judge, and two to serve as Associate Judges.

I now introduce this bill into the Underhusen for the 48 hour debate period, unless expedited by the Speaker or Speaker Pro Tempore, afterwards a motion to extend debate, table, or vote on this shall occur.

I'm going to reiterate my concern from previous discussion about giving random citizens power over constitutional law.

I'm going to reiterate my concern from previous discussion about giving random citizens power over constitutional law.

True, however if the Storting acts as the Court, then a Clear Conflict of interest occurs.

The time for debate has ended, Skrifa may now motion to extend debate, bring this to a vote, or table this.

However I now Motion for a 48 hour debate extension.

Do we have a second?

I second the motion to extend debate.

Motion Passed

I'm going to reiterate my concern from previous discussion about giving random citizens power over constitutional law.

True, however if the Storting acts as the Court, then a Clear Conflict of interest occurs.

How so?

Talk with Govindia on this, he's the one that cares about this.

Could the Speaker call the citizen to speak on behalf of this bill?

Fine I will allow Govindia to speak here.

As 48 hours have passed, it's time for a new motion.

Since discussion is ongoing in the Citizens Platform, I motion to extend debate for one week.

Do we have a second?

Hello, as my first action in the Underhusen as your newest Skrifa, I will second the motion to extend debate for a week.