This resolution has already already come up before a vote, because it gained the necessary approvals and entered the queue literally overnight. I've went ahead and cast an initial vote based on my opinion, but will also take note of the vote here and change mine if necessary. Feel free to discuss and vote!
Liberate the Greater German Reich
A resolution to strike down Delegate-imposed barriers to free entry in a region.
Description: Reaffirming the words of World Assembly Security Council Resolution #109 when it spoke of ideologies that were 'detrimental tot he international community as a whole'.
Concluding that these words apply to the views and ideology espoused by The Greater German Reich.
Recognising the work already done by international forces in multiple actions against The Greater German Reich and the co-operation such actions have fostered in the international community.
Appalled at the actions of The Greater German Reich's Delegate,
Communist Destroyer.
Acknowledging the significant colonial holdings of The Greater German Reich as something which is against the interests of the international community.
Hoping that this resolution can go even further in damaging The Greater German Reich.
Hereby Liberates The Greater German Reich
Monarch's Opinion: The Greater German Reich is a Nazi region, so of course something like this sounds good and I'm sure it will get many votes just because of that. However, the resolution gives no real reason why the region should be liberated. Yes, it gives reasons why the region should be condemned, but Greater German Reich was already condemned in SC Resolution #56. Additionally, the resolution will not actually accomplish anything. Liberation resolutions only prevent the Delegate of the region from password protecting the region, not the founder, and the region isn't even locked to start with.
Also as a small note, the nation it states as the Delegate of Greater German Reich doesn't appear to exist. That nation appears to have
ceased to exist over a month ago.
In the end, this appears to be a poor attempt to frame a condemnation as a liberation, perhaps to get around rules that forbid multiple condemnations against the same target for the same thing. For that reason, I'm opposed to this resolution.
