View Topic

I don't trust them.

I don't trust them.

Why not?

No, @Vroendal, I don't understand the reasoning for your vote. Up until your vote, we had a three-way tie. Your supporting argument for my vote was that you didn't really have a good reason - you just cited @Gerrick's reasoning and moved on. While most of your posts have been long-winded, your vote for me had just about your shortest reply so far. Knowing that your vote was most likely going to get me lynched, why cast it without an iota of evidence?  Meanwhile, you've been trying to cast doubt on the two people who I'm getting town vibes from (@Laurentus and @Adorable Oracle Hapi).

Vote: Vroendal

Also to address my D1 vote: I was simply responding in jest to the whole "no party" comment that Lau made. This is my first werewolf game, so I saw fit to have a little fun since I was sure we would get nowhere day 1. Clearly, I was wrong. I know now not to try and poke fun. Won't happen again. I simply didn't change my vote because once it was evident to me that I had made a mistake, we had a tie. I didn't want to break the tie and cause someone to get lynched who didn't deserve it.

My vote on you was an attempt to keep the possibility of lynching Lau or Michi to a minimum. I said I did not have a good reason because I hadn't seen anything from you that screamed wolf to me. My vote was an attempt to go for the best odds of lynching a wolf. I felt that of the three you were the most likely to be wolf, not having any other information to suggest anything else. Because you were tied and it did not appear as if anyone else was going to be tied, I felt I had to act quickly and I cast my vote. Gerrick's reasoning concerning his vote on you seemed to be logical, I deemed it fit to follow along with. My goal is not to cast doubt on Lau specifically, but rather to keep the possibilities open and to be aware that he holds a great deal of power in the town. I still do not feel like voting him. As for Hapi, again I'm keeping the possibilities open, and have rather been arguing for her, and Lau against. I was critical of a comment she posted, but I'm not going to vote for her either.

I was unaware this was your first WW game. I'm not trying to bash fun here, please don't think of me like that. D1 shenanigans are to be expected, it's just difficult for me at least to interpret what's just a goof and what is a calculated attempt to appear a certain way to town. No one wants to lynch someone undeservingly, but there are sacrifices that have to be made to gain information or progress the game forward. The moment the first person retaliated against a joke vote there was going to be a lynch.

I'm not surprised you're voting this way, if I'm lynched, so be it. I accept the consequences of my words. But until I'm lynched I'm going to fight it. I'm not guilty for voting the way I did.

I don't trust them.

Why not?

The only thing I think I've seen them say was accusing me

I'm not going to address anything Vro says until he gets around to ISO'ing me.

@turtle, what you're describing there is what we call an OMGUS vote. This is short for Oh My God You Suck. It's a vote characterised by voting for someone for no other reason than them voting for you.

OMGUS is usually not great, because a person's vote for you does not make them inherently suspicious. No one has any clue at the start if everyone else can be trusted, except for the wolves, and the odds are actually very high that townies will be suspicious of each other and even vote one another off.

What you should be looking for are two things: votes and actions that benefit Town, and votes and actions that benefit the wolves. To do this, you need to look at people's thought processes.

Honestly at this point I'm going to say this. I have such a different attitude and approach to this game than anyone else here because if I were scum I'd be screaming in scumchat to stay low profile especially D1 and just let town eat each other. But everyone wants to read so much into the psychology of every post lol.

Anyways Vro is playing an awful game and did jump the shark on a vote that led to the death of one Daws. But I don't think a wolf would just openly exclaim to make of that vote what you will. Like that's a death sentence. I'm still more concerned with Gerrick than anyone else.

As such

Vote: Gerrick

To further my claim Gerrick voted for Daws to create a tie but Vro immediately followed with a vote into Daws at that point Gerrick was active in the thread still and could've removed their vote or shifted it elsewhere to keep the tie in play.

They claimed to not want to push Michi or Lau over the edge but they had no issue killing Daws with little reason beyond hes to quiet. Let's create an even more confusing tie.

Honestly at this point I'm going to say this. I have such a different attitude and approach to this game than anyone else here because if I were scum I'd be screaming in scumchat to stay low profile especially D1 and just let town eat each other. But everyone wants to read so much into the psychology of every post lol.

Anyways Vro is playing an awful game and did jump the shark on a vote that led to the death of one Daws. But I don't think a wolf would just openly exclaim to make of that vote what you will. Like that's a death sentence. I'm still more concerned with Gerrick than anyone else.

As such

Vote: Gerrick

No, actually, Vro fits the description of a power-wolf to a tee right now, and no jokes, Vro, if you are a Wolf, you've made an insane improvement in your play since the one from 7-ish months ago, and you have my vote for representing Wintreath at the Mafia Champs next year.

The problem is also that I have seen a player pull the exact shit you're pulling now if you are a Wolf in my own Champs game this year and it was insanely effective.

This is what we describe as good wolfing...aye...

can I unvote

No, actually, Vro fits the description of a power-wolf to a tee right now, and no jokes, Vro, if you are a Wolf, you've made an insane improvement in your play since the one from 7-ish months ago, and you have my vote for representing Wintreath at the Mafia Champs next year.

The problem is also that I have seen a player pull the exact shit you're pulling now if you are a Wolf in my own Champs game this year and it was insanely effective.

Lau, I'm not going to talk at length about this bc I know you want my game analysis, but if possible if you are doing so I would ask that you not compare me to anyone else just to fit the theories in your mind. I am not that person, I don't know what they did. I'm Vro.

I detect a tone, Hapi, lol.

Power-wolfing is also called open-wolfing, because whenever you see it, literally everyone in spec chat screams that the person is a Wolf, many of the players who clearly see they're wolves are simply just killed, and the remaining players don't do anything because they're just like "there's no goddamned way that a Wolf would be this Wolfy."

can I unvote

Yes, you can.

can I unvote

Yes you can bold it and write unvote

No, actually, Vro fits the description of a power-wolf to a tee right now, and no jokes, Vro, if you are a Wolf, you've made an insane improvement in your play since the one from 7-ish months ago, and you have my vote for representing Wintreath at the Mafia Champs next year.

The problem is also that I have seen a player pull the exact shit you're pulling now if you are a Wolf in my own Champs game this year and it was insanely effective.

Lau, I'm not going to talk at length about this bc I know you want my game analysis, but if possible if you are doing so I would ask that you not compare me to anyone else just to fit the theories in your mind. I am not that person, I don't know what they did. I'm Vro.

You've spent time playing with Funnier over in Bulba, so I'd expect Power-wolfing to be well within your range by now.