I mean, I was already leaning against Vro anyways in my night post.
I found it amusing that he pulled exactly what I did on you D1 when TGN popped on a vote on me and broke the tie; go after the person that helped create the tie and ask them why they didn't remove it when they saw that the tie was broken. Only difference was that A) Your vote was more "random" and B) TGN is new and wasn't entirely sure what he was doing, and ended up removing his vote.
In Vro's case, this comes off as more blaming the person who didn't even start the wagon as opposed to taking responsibility as the person who broke the tie.
On top of that, his first D2 thing is going after you exactly for what I did for and gave you the clear for since as I said, it fits our normal bickering that we do even Day 1 when you're a townie role. Like...I don't see why that point about you not switching got repeated, especially after TGN changed their vote quickly anyways, and the tie itself was broken again later when Vro added another vote to Daws.
Like...that just feels to me like "Shit, I fucked up doing that and now I'm going to have all this suspicion, I better put the heat on that player that started a wagon on someone else and didn't change his vote!"
The reasoning presented later made no sense at all either. Keeping lynching myself or Lau to a minimum, going for the best odds of a wolf in D1 despite the fact that we very, very rarely hit a wolf D1 and more than likely hit a townie (and in our games, it's usually a power role townie since it's a weird tradition of ours to accidentally kill off a good role early), why on earth didn't you just vote either to keep the tie or vote someone that hadn't been listed yet so that it remained a 2-2-2 tie majority?
Like, I had to read that a few times because I couldn't comprehend what he was trying to go for with that logic.
So yeah, if it isn't obvious, my scum-lean read on Vro has shifted quite a bit. If I had to make a list, I'd go:
Town Lock: Currently none
Town Core: Laurentus (His style this game has been really in vibe with his townie style so far), Sapphiron, Wischland
Town Lean: HumanSanity, Gerrick, Dawsinian (He could have come back normally, he could have come back as a wraith as suggested, but right now I'm more town-leaning him), Doc
No read: Turtle, TGN, Wintermoot, BSR, ENE, Willie, Dawcreek, Ogun (didn't realize he was even playing), Flying Eagles
Unsure: Hapi
Scum Red Alerts: Vroendal
My list is pretty yikes right now with all of the nulls, mainly because either the people haven't responded much to give an impression (Moot, BSR), are players from our ally region that I'm not familiar with their playstyles (ENE, Flying eagles, Willie), have been absent (Dawcreek, Ogun), are new and while it could be easy to give them both a derp clear because of it, it's possible one of them could be a wolf (turtle, TGN). Suffice it to say, it's worrying there's so many null reads.
There's also the fact that Hapi is making me continuously second guess. She makes strong cases for herself to where she should definitely be town, but the continued Aragorn quoting feels like a really heavy-handed attempt to try to solidify that she's Aragorn to the point where a wolf might continuously try to convince players that they're townie. It almost feels an attempt at deep-wolfing where she's trying to convince not only us, but herself that she's this good guy that she has been quoting so often.
And I've already made my case about Vro, so I'll end this with a vote.
Vote: Vroendal
