View Topic

Huh. I'm actually realising something. Can someone check my sanity here?

Did it look to anyone else that Aragonn was trying to distance himself from the Mathy kill?

*like Aragonn was distancing, my apologies.

I merely pointed out the hypocrisy of his reasoning.

Oh really?

Same could be said about you, buddy.

Except I haven't piled my vote on anyone in the first two days, so no.

Except you just did pile your vote. And it seems like you've completely ignored the suspicions and reasonings of other people. You've put less thought and effort into your vote than I did.

This directly contradicts Doc's earlier post:

And in light of Aragonn again going in as the second vote on someone without all that convincing an argument being laid out, that looks pretty sketch to me.
I'm gonna look like a flip-flopping moron here with 2 posts in 5 minutes where I go off on someone but hell with it, Vote: Aragonn.

In other words, Doc and I have both voted for Aragonn for the same reason, which directly contradicts Aragonn's assertion that I've completely ignored the suspicions and reasoning of others.

Couple that with how hard he's trying to portray me as an irrational busser, and I'm pretty convinced he's scum.

It also looks like he was trying to pin the kill on another member of House Valeria, which I'm assuming is the distancing @Laurentus is referencing, which is even scummier, not that I needed more convincing at this point.

Yeah, at this point, I think we've found our Wolf.

Vote: Aragonn

Looks like multiple people have suspicions about Aragonn. I agree with them and Vote: Aragonn.

Doc seems to have given very good reasons for voting Moot.  While Aragonn appearing voting on piles is suspicious, I think it might be better to vote to lynch other suspicious looking players.  Before I vote though I will wait to see more discussion which will hopefully include other players who haven't spoken like @Gerrick @El Fiji Grande @Wintermoot and @Ruguo.

While Aragonn appearing voting on piles is suspicious, I think it might be better to vote to lynch other suspicious looking players.

...are you trying to have your cake and eat it too as far as bussing Aragonn goes, because right now it looks like you're simultaneously trying to bus him and quietly protect him too.
This is some pretty weak reasoning that's pushing me to file you right between Aragonn and Moot in my Suspicion Rankings™, such that it is presently
1) Aragonn
2) Kane
3) Wintermoot

Of course, I guess if we find that Aragonn is town that might exonerate Kane for this...vague gesturing towards the bus lane...that he's trying to pull (because that's how weak a bussing this is, he's not throwing him under the bus, he's indicating where one could conceivably find a bus), because in the exoneration case (which I should stress is the most charitable interpretation imaginable), they're in the Seer Squad and so in contact.
But I sorta doubt it.

I rather think a Seer would put up a slightly firmer defence.

Hey everyone! Vote for me! I'm the guy you want!

Guys, we found him! Vote: Aragonn

I rather think a Seer would put up a slightly firmer defence.

A seer I am not.

While Aragonn appearing voting on piles is suspicious, I think it might be better to vote to lynch other suspicious looking players.

...are you trying to have your cake and eat it too as far as bussing Aragonn goes, because right now it looks like you're simultaneously trying to bus him and quietly protect him too.
This is some pretty weak reasoning that's pushing me to file you right between Aragonn and Moot in my Suspicion Rankings™, such that it is presently
1) Aragonn
2) Kane
3) Wintermoot

Of course, I guess if we find that Aragonn is town that might exonerate Kane for this...vague gesturing towards the bus lane...that he's trying to pull (because that's how weak a bussing this is, he's not throwing him under the bus, he's indicating where one could conceivably find a bus), because in the exoneration case (which I should stress is the most charitable interpretation imaginable), they're in the Seer Squad and so in contact.
But I sorta doubt it.

You could say I am playing a Devil's Advocate here but doing a terrible job at it hence my reasoning for waiting to see more of what is said first before I finalize my arguments and votes.  I am not surprised that you find me suspicious because I haven't been the most active and I tend to give unusual or suspicious reasoning for my votes.
I can assure you all that I am definitely not one of the wolves.
Yes I am defending Aragonn because while he definitely has been acting suspicious; isn't he always acting suspicious in games of Werewolf and usually not a wolf in those games?  Think of Star Wars Werewolf, Warhammer Werewolf, and the Werewolf Song of Ice and Fire (if you were a Lannister for the latter)

I think he is just trying to provoke discussion but in the process provoking a wagon.

Just wanted to apologize for inactivity, was travelling today for spring break.  Let me read over everything that's happened and I'll got a scumspect list up.

I rather think a Seer would put up a slightly firmer defence.

A seer I am not.

While Aragonn appearing voting on piles is suspicious, I think it might be better to vote to lynch other suspicious looking players.

...are you trying to have your cake and eat it too as far as bussing Aragonn goes, because right now it looks like you're simultaneously trying to bus him and quietly protect him too.
This is some pretty weak reasoning that's pushing me to file you right between Aragonn and Moot in my Suspicion Rankings™, such that it is presently
1) Aragonn
2) Kane
3) Wintermoot

Of course, I guess if we find that Aragonn is town that might exonerate Kane for this...vague gesturing towards the bus lane...that he's trying to pull (because that's how weak a bussing this is, he's not throwing him under the bus, he's indicating where one could conceivably find a bus), because in the exoneration case (which I should stress is the most charitable interpretation imaginable), they're in the Seer Squad and so in contact.
But I sorta doubt it.

You could say I am playing a Devil's Advocate here but doing a terrible job at it hence my reasoning for waiting to see more of what is said first before I finalize my arguments and votes.  I am not surprised that you find me suspicious because I haven't been the most active and I tend to give unusual or suspicious reasoning for my votes.
I can assure you all that I am definitely not one of the wolves.
Yes I am defending Aragonn because while he definitely has been acting suspicious; isn't he always acting suspicious in games of Werewolf and usually not a wolf in those games?  Think of Star Wars Werewolf, Warhammer Werewolf, and the Werewolf Song of Ice and Fire (if you were a Lannister for the latter)

I think he is just trying to provoke discussion but in the process provoking a wagon.

Thats... actually a really good point.

Think of Star Wars Werewolf, Warhammer Werewolf, and the Werewolf Song of Ice and Fire (if you were a Lannister for the latter)

uh, hello, the official Doc namelist of Werewolves is

XI: Werehammer 40K
XII: The Host Did It
XIII: Wolfoween
XIV: GoTWolf: King's Landing Edition and XIV.2: GoTWolf: Wall Edition (or in Square Enix form, XIV: 2: GoTWolf: Dream Drop Distance)
XV: Fashion Bitches
XVI: Aren't Werewolves and Vampires Supposed To Be At War, Why Are They The Same Thing Now
XVII: Star Weres: A New Wolf
XVIII: My Talent is Dying Horribly
XIX: The Three Heads of the Wolf
XX: Almost Everyone Lived Happily Ever After

Kane is here referring to XIV and XVII, and I must assume also to XI unless there was another Werehammer that happened before I joined the forums.

My certainty in Aragonn's guilt is not as absolute now that you've brought in previous patterns of behaviour for the same thing, but I don't see a more aus person, either way. I certainly don't think Hydra is more suspicious.

*sus, not "aus"

Autocorrect can FOAD.