View Topic

Wow. A lot has happened since I've been away. Glad I checked back.

Vote: No Lynch
Reasoning: No information yet.

Vote: No lynch

Reason:  It's way more likely that we'd lynch an innocent player at this point. 

Here's the thing, we won't ever get any information unless we search for it. I'm gonna glance at other games I've played offsite and come up with some strats for making Day 1 useful. I suggest everyone else do the same.

I'm loath to waste my No Lynch on the first day. We all only get to vote No Lynch 3 times before we are ourselves auto-lynched, and not lynching today means we must tomorrow.

While it's probable that we'll have more information on a proceeding day, as long as the majority of us vote No Lynch nobody will be lynched right?

It's a razor's edge that we need to walk, but I think slightly less than the majority of us should vote to lynch someone in order to save No Lynch votes for later in the game where there might be even MORE uncertainty. Does anyone have any objections to that? Am I wrong about the effect of No Lynches?

If last game was any indication, we have a long game ahead of us.

Evelynx your understanding of the rules is....very far off...

There is no rule that says we can only vote No Lynch three times. The only rule I can see you pulling that from is Rule 9, which does not exist in a Vacuum.

The voting rule states that even if we don't want to lynch someone we must state that we are voting No Lynch. You can vote No Lynch whenever you want, you just have to make sure you are casting a vote.

At least that is what I believe to be the intention of @Laurentus given what he has said and done.

I just have a hard time sitting still and doing nothing in this game. That's why I voted for someone instead of voting for a no lynch.

Chanku is correct. Feel free to not lynch for as long as you like, but if it becomes the norm, the rules may change. As long as you state your intention (lynch or no lynch), then you won't be considered inactive.

I might as well keep my vote for now. Just please, unless you actually find a good reason to do this, lets not stockpile this early until we know what our solid evidence is

Chanku and Point Breeze are correct.

Vote: Lynch @Laurentus.

If that isn't allowed, I suppose I'll switch my vote to No Lynch for today.

Wait, CAN we lynch the host?

Alas. There is no rule against it. But killing a god means the end of existence, so that's something to consider.

Change Vote to: Lynch Laurentus

I encourage everyone to lynch the host rather than not lynch.

Alas. There is no rule against it. But killing a god means the end of existence, so that's something to consider.

Something something rabbit holes?