View Topic

Lol.
I do not wish to get someone thats a peaceful person in trouble so i abstained.
Next time i will probably vote for someone that wont get lynched.

Well, you know, the objective of the game is to vote off the wolves before they can kill enough people, so niceness shouldn't really factor into it.

I mean, we can still have a great time, but we need to vote people off if we want to win.

I'm thinking Tomb is pretty suspicious, just willing to jump onto the wagon like that, so I think I may vote for them, sorry ;-;

Sapphiron has made a very good argument against Tomb....
I vote for Tomb

Now is when we should all start praying that neither Crushita nor Tomb are the seer.  Or, as Laurentus suggests, a defender.  Looking at history, I'm not hopeful.

Well, if either of them are, I'll quote The Wire: "Oh, shiiiaat."

ITS NOT IN THERE!
I don't think...

ADD: Oh wait there it is. That sneaky bastard. I READ IT 3 TIMES!

For the love of god, guys, stop editing your posts!

Tip #4: All records should be kept in the public's eye
One thing that will garner unwanted attention is editing your posts.  Regardless of whether it's because there was a spelling error or grammatical error, it won't matter; as far as other players are concerned, your post was edited because you accidentally had something crucial that would have implicated you as the wolf, and you edited it because you noticed said accident and omitted it.  It is in your best interest to keep your posts fresh, and if there's any crucial mistakes you feel need fixing, say it in another post.

Those are guidelines though. Feel free to vote for someone if they've edited their post. Personally, if people don't subtract any content from the original post, I am prepared to overlook it.

Those are guidelines though. Feel free to vote for someone if they've edited their post. Personally, if people don't subtract any content from the original post, I am prepared to overlook it.

You can't tell whether or not they subtracted any content from the post though.

Well, we just have to trust that they didn't ^o^

So here are the current votes:

Aragonn: Commander Zemas
Tainted Paws: Crushita Telcontar
Rasdanation: VidiLune
Evelynx: Rasdanation
Barnes: Crushita Telcontar (2)
taulover: Grand Land of BLarg
BraveSirRobin: RedRevenant/Sci (2)
Crushita Telcontar: RedRevenant/Sci (3)
Wintermoot: Crushita Telcontar (3)
RedRevenant/Sci: Abstain
Tomb: Crushita Telcontar (4)
VidiLune: Crushita Telcontar (5)
Laurentus: Crushita Telcontar (6)
Sapphiron: Tomb
Lumenland: Tomb (2)? If this is a vote, you might want to outright say it since you said "I think I may vote for them, sorry" which may or may not be considered.
Crushita Telcontar: Tomb (3)

So on Crushita, we either have one baddie in Crushita, some baddies in those who voted for him, or just a bunch of bandwagoners. He seems to vote for whomever has the next most votes, which is obviously a survival tactic. Nobody seems to be trying to save him, though, so unless the other psychos are sacrificing him to remain anonymous, I think he is most likely innocent.

On RedRevenant/Sci, I'm going to assume he's just too new to all of this to make so many mistakes, so I think he's innocent.

Hmm, for now I'm going to lean towards the side that at least some of the voters for Crushita are baddies. I'm also going to assume Wintermoot is innocent because of his rhetoric (unless he's just a really good werewolf), and thus I'm going to say Tomb is innocent as well for his following of Wintermoot.

Finally, I am most suspicious of Tainted Paws, Barnes, and VidiLune for their bandwagon voting while not saying much. But because she did not give a reason for her vote, did not respond to the vote for her, her playing innocent at the beginning, and since she has more votes than the other two:
I vote for VidiLune.

As do I. Your reasoning is sound.

Vote: VidiLune

Trust will get y'all killed up here. Not asking any of you to trust me one bit, but I don't think that anyone is gon' be outing themselves the first night. If I was a psychopath, planning to kill tonight, or a monster planning to feed, my mouth would be zipped tighter than a bank vault. As such, I'm rather partial to the idea of voting for one of the latecomers, if they aren't with us.. well I suppose they might as well be against us, for all the good they'll do.
Now in times like these I feel like it helps to jot yerself down a tidy little list.

Now here's all the folks who haven't put a word into our little discussion:

* @Frozen
* @Bootsie
* @HannahB
* @Grand Land of BLarg
* @Broddring Empire


Of those, neither Frozen nor Grand Land of BLarg have been seen 'round these parts since after the party began, safe to say if they are psychopaths they don't know it yet.

That leaves:

* @Bootsie
* @HannahB
* @Broddring Empire

That means, given a total of 6 enemies amidst us kindly folk already at the party, that at least 3 of us psychopaths or worse.
*looks around the room suspiciously*
I suppose I'll just have to be keepin' this all in mind, I think I might be changing my vote here soon.

If you're in either of these lists, I suggest you put in a good word for yourself right quick.

Hm...
Yes, I vote Tomb, considering that they were simply going off of what Wintermoot said, and that to means appears as though they are in kahoots together. Which, would make me think it's possible that they both are psychopaths, or something of that matter o.o
It's a big 'what if' situation, but who knows? o.o

Before time runs out, I'm changing my vote.

Vote: VidiLune