Don't want to come off as overly defensive, but I didn't attempt to save Crushita, I just suspected North more than I suspected Crushita so I wanted the dice to determine which died. I now realize it flew in the face of the democratic process and wasn't my decision to make, but at the time I justified that by attempting to put myself at risk as well. It didn't pan at out that way, and I wish I hadn't done it.
It was a mistake... however, I would also point out that I was also one of the first people to cast suspicion on Crushita originally (not in round 1, but in the round before this one: see
http://wintreath.com/forums/index.php?topic=3255.msg62529#msg62529), when nobody else was paying attention to him. Wolves might sacrifice one of their own when it becomes clear they are on their way out, but why would I have cast suspicion on them when nobody was talking about him?
My voting record during that period, for the sake of transparency, was:
Voted for North
Voted for Crushita
Voted for North at the last second.
I think that this fits the profile of someone who suspected both North and Crushita, and then made a stupid mistake that only caused confusion and didn't really accomplish much, more than it fits the profile of someone who was trying to save a compatriot.
TL;DR If I wanted to save Crushita, I wouldn't have quoted voting records and wrote paragraphs of analysis in order to cast suspicion on him.
That concludes my opening defense. If anyone has additional concerns, I will respond to them.