View Topic

I vote North as well. I was a little concerned on who to vote for, but I believe that the evidence presented against them is strong.

Witch hunters.

I suppose it is a bit of a witch hunt, except psychopaths actually exist.

Though, since they haven't actually managed to kill anyone, maybe there are no psychopaths.
 

Who do you think is most likely, Laurentus?
Why does my smiley keep going to the end of my post..

From the rules:

If you meet these guys while you're split up, you'll most likely end up getting killed.

Perhaps the psychopaths' luck is going the same way as ours.

One can only hope.

Aragonn, Barnes and Wintermoot are most suspicious to, but I'm biased.

And I'm ALWAYS suspicious of Colby, because I don't think he'd leave any evidence for us to pick up on.

But I don't want to make a habit of voting for people based on absolutely no clues.

Well since we're already voting, I'm going with Laurentus again, for the same reason. Like I said last round, I have a feeling about him, so I'm gonna be like a dog with a bone on this one.

I vote Wintermoot. It's fairly reactionary, though. I just don't appreciate him trying to kill me all the time.

Of course that'd be a convenient excuse to go after your accuser...

Anything in this game can be seen as an excuse. I don't want to vote for North or Evelynx, and I suspect there's a link between at least you and Barnes. So that's where my vote's at. Voting for me based on nothing but instinct is also just about the poorest reason I've seen. If that's not bandwagoning, I don't know what is.

Watch as Barnes also votes for me.

You mean like you suspected a link between me and Tomb?

*mumbles something incoherent*

Pretty unfortunate that he turned out to be a friend...or perhaps you consider it fortunate.

If guilt is defined only by voting for someone who turned out not to be guilty, then we're all monsters.

Incidentally, that's exactly what I'm trying to avoid by not falling on the "lynch North" bandwagon.