View Topic

I don't think you have read my posts properly - I said you are the one who readily classified your argument as "crap". By the way, "yours truly" means "myself" so read through what you wrote again and find the irony. Meanwhile, you are throwing out the terms "more logical" as if it's some form of weird emotional appeal, and it doesn't help when it comes from a psychopath.

Wow, I don't think I've ever seen Sapphiron like this.

It's kinda hot tbh.

Going after someone on feeble logic because 'she wasn't suspicious of someone', when if fact they were and stated so earlier, or going after someone who is actually suspicious, has been seen many times slipping past accusations like as if they were nothing, and still refuses to answer them. Geez, maybe I'm the only one having a hard time seeing why you're not acting very logical about this.

I think Sapp-san is trying to bring out my passive aggressive side o.o

I'm just pointing out actual, real facts that weren't pulled out from no where: your logic has a very limited base in all reality, when compared to oh boy look, someone else who is actually suspicious! :p

Just to make sure that I don't forget to vote like I did last time, I'm going to vote for Bootsie for now as Bootsie will be killed for inactivity anyway.

Most people are like dead silent are you guys okay usually we talk a lot

Well based on the exchange I think the baddie is either Lumenland or Sapphiron...the question is which.

I'm going to go...Lumenland. I will believe in this new, more assertive and aggressive Sapphiron's abilities. And if he's the baddie...well, fuck me.

Wintermoot-san, I thought I could count on you to see better reasoning in this situation, but alright ;-;

I'm going to vote for Lumenland, but thanks for prematurely thinking I'm gonna be killed for inactivity.

Both Sapphiron and Lumenland are being... awful and defensive... but I think Sapphiron is the one trying to really cause an argument. And besides, he immediately jumped the gun on voting for Lumenland without even including any words of follow-up in his post. His insistence on "friend-aligned players" corresponding to his agenda rather than letting the players decide for themselves basically uses the loaded argument of "if you disagree with me, you must be a psychopath", which doesn't help his case, either. I don't believe that kind of phrasing has been thrown out in this round before, so the change of pace/attitude is suspicious. I know we're nearing the endgame, but still...

And because Lumenland is a new player, what if it just means we're having a BraveSirRobin situation all over again? And we all know how well that boded for him...

Vote: Sapphiron

Thank you, finally someone gets my point ;-;

If anything, I think I'll change my vote toSapphiron, simply because I find what he is doing to be extremely suspicious. He isn't the first person to vote against me, so it's not like I care about that, but how he's acting makes me feel uneasy about what his role could be, and how he's acting also has an air of hiding to it.

So be it. By now, I am just going to say if by some chance I end up being lynched, when my role as a friend-aligned character is revealed, I sincerely urge all other friend-aligned characters to vote against Lumenland.

I might as well just urge people to vote against Sapp-san then *shrugs*
Your suspiciousness is starting to worry me.

I might as well just urge people to vote against Sapp-san then *shrugs*

Would you like to offer your survival in the next Team Discussion as well?