View Topic

Wait, isn't it against the rules to refer to our PMs and hint at our roles?

I will vote for Crushita simply due to the fact that I know Wintermoot and he's voted for (technically against) him/her.

I'm honestly not sure what to think at this point.

While Wintermoot's actions haven't been strange, I must say this type of bandwagoning by Tomb is. You have no other reason to vote for someone other simply than Wintermoot doing it, so why not?

That is interesting. Could we perhaps have two defenders or wolves working together? Either seem like a possibility.

The least suspicious person, often can turn out to be the most suspicious in the long run o.o

And you are the least suspicious person Lumenland

I vote: Crushita

I am? Well, I have nothing to hide, so that's good ^o^

I think I'll wait until it's closer to the end to vote, since I don't wanna make a choice now, then change it later and upset someone ;-;

Unless Crushita can offer some sort of reasonable defence, I suppose I'll vote for him. Someone has to get killed, and right now he seems the strangest. I really hope this isn't another WW4 situation. If you are indeed innocent, I'm terribly sorry.

Vote: Crushita Telcontar

I notice that you're making the complete opposite statement as you did last time. Considering that you were the wolf last time (I think?), I'm not sure how to interpret that...

In case anyone is wondering which post taulover is referring to,

The way I see it, the point of the game is to lynch someone we think is a wolf...failing the ability to do that on the first turn, at least voting off someone that will probably be removed anyway will keep the game active longer by delaying the removal of an active player. And who knows, maybe the inactive player has a bad role.

It's not my favourite route to take, but compared to what everyone else is doing I think it's a valid tactic. Feel free to disagree.

Well, if players remain inactive I presume they'll be removed from the game eventually...so I think we should focus our efforts on the active players.

Wintermoot, would you like to respond to taulover's enquiry?

Meanwhile, I will be voting for Tomb. While he has claimed that his vote is reliant on Wintermoot's judgement skills, it is a fact that his vote has tipped the scales against Crushita (as the fourth vote while Sci only has three) and such a hazy reasoning just doesn't justify it.

Oh, wow o.o
Everyone here is so smart and detective like, hehe

Sapphiron's point is actually a damn good one. My only fear is that Tomb and WM could be defenders.

I dunno, it is kinda odd that Tomb would just be so willing to accuse someone else, just because another person said so and they trust their judgement o.o 

Indeed it is odd... Very odd
 Though apparently so am I for.... Talking about Potatoes and snow...
Why am.I being voted against again? XD

Talking about potatoes instead of Werewolf.

As opposed to talking about RP instead of Werewolf?