View Topic

Nope, no suggestions. It was clearly a coincidence that Werewolf #3 managed to have Wintermoot killed in Night 1 (Werewolf #1)  and resulting in the death of a Seer (Werewolf #2).

I actually never made that connection before.  It's like those games were foreshadowing Wintermoot being the Seer and then being killed off on the first night.   

Nope, no suggestions. It was clearly a coincidence that Werewolf #3 managed to have Wintermoot killed in Night 1 (Werewolf #1)  and resulting in the death of a Seer (Werewolf #2).

I'm not sure what that means, as I haven't played. But I assume either Wintermoot gets killed often, or the seer does.

By my understanding we still have another Seer to help us so all is not lost. Will need to re-read the rules but if we tie will someone still get lynched?

Will need to re-read the rules but if we tie will someone still get lynched?

According to the previous game, in the event of a tie, there will still be someone lynched (with the assistance of Randomizer).

Meanwhile, I shall Vote: Send The Candy Lane to Duel. I mean, it's common knowledge that there is nothing in this universe that is better at deception than the Candy House that Hansel and Gretel was fixated on.

Really, really bad luck to lose our Seer so early two games in a row. But we overcame that last game, so not all is lost.

To our advantage, unlike last game, we still have Yugi, who can scan or defend on two nights, but who will probably want to scan rather than defend, given Wintermoot's loss. Plus, we've got the two defenders.

There's not much to go on, as usual this early in the game. I don't place much stock in Laurentus' vote against Wintermoot. Although I think he said it's his first game, so it's possibly a newbie mistake, I doubt the wolves would want to draw attention to him if he were one of them by killing Wintermoot.

Unless something pops up, I'll likely go with a random vote later.

I'm at a loss. Had my vote succeeded in the last day phase, we would have killed the seer ourselves. I really hope I won't have to resort to a randomiser this round before a wolf betrays himself.

That depends on whether Pengu will make it compulsory for everyone to post/vote in the day phases for this round of Werewolf. (Compare Werewolf #1 and Werewolf #2)

I only know the XKIers here so I've done a random vote out of them.

Sorry Barry but you didn't give me any tea this game.

Lynch: Barry

I'm not ready to resort to a randomizer yet.

The phase doesn't have much time left, folks.

I'll vote to send Laurentus to the duel

It appears you guys like to use randomizers early on in the game. I don't play much forum games of this type but when I have done, I've not found randomizers to be the best way to go.

I'd rather we lynched someone based on something rather than nothing, as it gives us more to go on in subsequent cycles. Randomizing becomes a substitute for discussion and hunting.

The only people doing anything of interest (i.e. voting for someone) day 1 were Wintermoot, Amalya and Laurentus - thanks aternox. This phase, Sapphiron, Sauron and the Candy Lane have supposedly come up with a random vote, with Barry promising to later. I'm not sure there's going to be a majority for anyone this round at this rate. I think there's still one or two people left to say something this round, and I'm sure a few will speak more over the next day or so, so I'll leave my vote til tomorrow.

Well. Should we be allowed to skip voting this phase, and the idea gets support, I'll vote no lynch.

For now though, I'll need to Vote: Lynch The Candy Lane

Well. Should we be allowed to skip voting this phase, and the idea gets support.

Truly a lupin way of thinking.
Very interesting.


Vote, No Lynch

Well. Should we be allowed to skip voting this phase, and the idea gets support.

Truly a lupin way of thinking.
Very interesting.


Vote, No Lynch

I'm just trying to stay alive. If I don't tip a majority in favour of no lynching, I'd really rather let the one who wants to lynch me get lynched.

I don't think bandwagoning against one person is a good thing, so to keep things close:

Vote Lynch: Barry

I consider random votes to be tools that initiate conversations. It sure did, just not enough.