What It Means To Burn It Down
Written by: Doc
Burn It Down is a rallying cry that I have taken up over the last few years. In and of itself, it's a fairly comedic notion; that we should abandon the institution of representative democracy with sort of a feckless heed for what comes after, and I triple down on this by constantly publicly vacillating between a desire for the direct-democracy-style Open Assembly and the absolute-monarchist position that Wintermoot should just appoint all his officials and make all the decisions himself or through this bureaucracy. Which is insane, because those are basically two exact opposites of each other on the political spectrum, and I'm de facto endorsing both of them at the same time.
But then again, I find that to be sort of the point.
An NS region, and really any online community in general, is sort of a low-stakes environment. Sure, there are decisions of governance that need to be made, whether administrative or moderative in nature. But this is all fairly low-stakes governance; issues of how people interact with each other in an online setting almost inevitably are, particularly absent gamification and/or an economy. In this context, there isn't really the need for the checks and balances we demand/require in our Real World institutions of governance; what's important is, essentially, two things: how representative we want our governance to be - which is to say, who should have a voice in how we self-administer our communities - and how efficient we want our governance to be.
The Underhusen is sort-of representative, in that we elect representatives for us, and it's sort-of efficient, in the sense that we know who's nominally supposed to do things, but in neither case is it really ideal...besides which, it suffers from the problem that anyone who's ever had a manager over them has experienced on a regular basis: it feels like it isn't doing enough and that one day someone is going to realize that it isn't doing enough, and so it needs to justify its continued existence. Which it does with silly makework legislation.
Worse yet, it
doesn't even really govern; most functions of governance are either handled by the Cabinet and its various Ministries/Jarldoms, or by the Administrative/Moderator/Operator staff, who handle the day-to-day running of things and smoothing things over necessary to make things sort of
work. Sometimes it passes legislation to make a holiday, or give someone a commendation, but these are generally things the community as a whole agrees on anyway, and which could thus be done in an Open Assembly.
And so, frankly, I'm opined that the Underhusen exists because it existed in the past and we're just sort of letting inertia carry us forward. And I think that's a foolish way to try and handle our community governance. And so that's the
essence, I think, of what the Burner cause is. Burn It Down isn't supposed to be a rallying cry for one direction or another; it's just supposed to be an observation that our present system doesn't really work particularly well, and we're probably better off just replacing it entirely.