View Topic

I introduced the 6th Amendment to the Procedural Rules of the Underhusen a couple of weeks back, which was unanimously voted yes for. It established the Better Archive of the Underhusen, which I posted shortly after in the Underhusen forums and the Citizens' Platform. In the CP thread, I wrote that I hoped for similar legislation in the Overhusen, which hasn't happened yet even after I posted this thread to remind the Overhusen of my wishes to establish this. I am more than willing to help the Chairperson of the Overhusen to set up the archive if he/she so wishes.
I therefore bring forth this initiative to amend the Overhusen Procedural Rules to create an archive like the one established in the Underhusen.

The Monarchy recognizes this initiative proposal in line with Article IV Sections 4-6 of the Fundamental Laws.

There were 22 voters in the last election...thus, pursuant to Article IV Section 5, this initiative needs six signatures from them including that of the petitioner by 11/22 12:29PM Eastern Time to be included in the next election.

I didn't vote in the initial UH election, but I voted when Govindia was elected to the opened position mid-term. Does this make me eligible to voice myself here?

Regardless of if it counts or not, I support this initiative.

Article IV Section 5 of the Fundamental Laws states that only people who voted in the last regular election can sign petitions. The last regular election was the October 1-7 Underhusen election, and since you didn't vote in it your signature would not be valid.

*inserts signature*

I shall sign.

Jon Osborne
President of Point Breeze